Electric Autonomy finds out what makes the Jeff Dahn Research Group so appealing to Tesla in their goal to build to world's best batteries
electricautonomy.ca
The first questions is whether or not this “Silicon carbide,” is the silicon process described on battery day,
Battery day:-
- Raw Metallurgical Silicon
- Stabilise surface - though elastic ion-conduction polymer coating
- Robust network - Highly elastic binder + electrode design,
en.wikipedia.org
Silicon carbide is expensive but it does seem possible that Tesla could make their own Silicon Carbide which they may needed to do for volume battery manufacture.
However, it doesn't seem that Silicon Carbide is is the silicon process described on battery day.
Drew has also said that all the benefits of battery day might not be realised until 2026, but hunch would be that silicon will be one of the last benefits.
There are implications for the Roadster because perhaps neither silicon path will be fast enough for Roadster deliveries to start in 2024/2025.
However, one form of producing Silicon Carbide seems arguably better than the battery day silicon process.
I assume that Tesla can control this process to grow single crystals of the desired size.
This version does mention polymers, so could perhaps be the battery day process
Still this is making the SiC itself into a polymer not adding a polymer coating, unless this polymer is used to coat silicon. (then converted to Silicon Carbide).
What his all means for the Roadster timeline is hard to guess, I am now not sure if silicon anodes are a mandatory requirement.