TSLA_Hopeful
Member
If he was not Elon Musk he may have. I am not sure what it would get us.
If the buyout comes I’m gonna sell half and lock in the profits. Cash me out Elon.
Funny Memes Viral Moments GIF by Identity - Find & Share on GIPHY
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he was not Elon Musk he may have. I am not sure what it would get us.
At this point, I am essentially waiting to see how much *influence* the Saudis will have. I guess I don't really care if they get non-voting shares, but if they get a lot of voting shares I would worry about malign influence.I have my doubts about the Saudi’s too, but remembered this: Pecunia non olet - Wikipedia
If you have doubts about the Saudi’s, maybe it’s better to get as much TSLAP as possible, every share you get is one the the Saudi’s don’t get.
Honestly, as a bull, I’m extremely disappointed in Elon. Doing what he did on Twitter was dumb and short sighted for so many reasons.
1) it gives all his leverage away in negotiations with Saudis. Now, the Saudis can ask for little to no restrictions on a private investment and Elon is backed into a corner since he said funding secured and investor support confirmed.
2) Guys, funding was not secured. I have not doubt that it CAN BE secured... but it wasn’t at the time. If he waited until after market hours and wrote a blog like what was published I think that would be fine. But he had to open his Twitter and act hastily.
3) the piece that I am most frustrated with is how little he cares for us Longs. As other people have mentioned, the only plausible explanation was the stock price was moving too high too quickly and the private premium was going to be too low to take it private. Or else, he could have waited until markets close. I’ve waited five years for stock to significantly appreciate. Five long years of supporting the company through very thin times, with countless amounts of FUD. Just as it’s going up, because it interferes with Elon’s plans of going private, he would rip those gains from us?
Honestly, what he did was at the very least reckless (as waiting until after market hours is a low barrier he should meet), but he really doesn’t care about our interests. I don’t think he realizes how irresponsible it is to preach messages about helping transition the world to sustainable energy and encouraging us to invest along with, yet treating our financial well being as secondary. For us, we are going all in with him. But for him to do what he did recently is absolutely unacceptable, and as shareholders we need to let him know that.
Interesting insights into Saudi palace intrigue. Sounds to me like the PIF director is currently in favor with the Crown Prince, but we'll see if they fall out of favor.Wonder where this fits in SoftBank’s Mega Solar Deal in Saudi Arabia Faces a Rocky Future
Honestly, as a bull, I’m extremely disappointed in Elon. Doing what he did on Twitter was dumb and short sighted for so many reasons.
1) it gives all his leverage away in negotiations with Saudis. Now, the Saudis can ask for little to no restrictions on a private investment and Elon is backed into a corner since he said funding secured and investor support confirmed.
2) Guys, funding was not secured.
There are no legal repercussions for saying "funding secured," said Frank Aquila, an M&A partner at Sullivan & Cromwell.
"It's sort of the same difference between collusion and conspiracy," Aquila said. "Collusion isn't a crime. It means nothing in the legal sense. Conspiracy is a crime. If you say 'I secured this,' it could mean you had a conversation. Committed means something else. If you have committed financing, you have documentation and conditions. Secured just means lined up. It doesn't mean that much."
Elon Musk on Twitter
"I’m excited to work with Silver Lake and Goldman Sachs as financial advisors, plus Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Munger, Tolles & Olson as legal advisors, on the proposal to take Tesla private"
I don't think you get it. The board had instructed Musk to talk about the Saudi deal with major investors like Fidelity, T Rowe Price, etc. He was going to do so that day. It would be illegal (SEC violation) for him to do so without telling the rest of us, so he told the rest of us. And that's outright what Musk said today.He couldn’t wait six hours and avoid the SEC???
hostile takeovers from middle eastern sovereign wealth funds?Munger, Tolles and Olsen is Charlie Munger's law firm.
Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway.
For what it's worth.
The first thing I found out about Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is that it's famous for helping companies avoid hostile takeovers.
Small is lucrative for Wachtell, corporate America's legal defense...
I think this has more to do with people waiting on the messed up german EV incentive system to not screw over tesla buyers. Also germans are less likely to spend a fortune on a car, Model 3 is a lot more reasonable in cost/performance than Model S, if you can do without biohazard mode and liftgate hatchback. Its basically half the cost of a comparable Model S.
I don't speak lawyeresque perfectly, but I think that that was 10% substance and 90% caveats. Seems very prudent though.
Right. As much as I enjoy Elon's candid tweets, I'm not gonna complain if Law and PR review his upcoming communications about going private...I don't speak lawyeresque perfectly, but I think that that was 10% substance and 90% caveats. Seems very prudent though.
I kept waiting for someone to point that out.Munger, Tolles and Olsen is Charlie Munger's law firm.
Charlie Munger of Berkshire Hathaway.
...
I kept waiting for someone to point that out.
Some additional reference points FWIW:
-Berkshire Hathaway has a major position in BYD;
-Berkshire Hathaway makes minority and controlling investments then lets management manage;
-https://www.mto.com/about-us. Reading some of this gives a very good idea.
For the record Munger, Tolles is NOT Berkshire Hathaway ( 'BH' )but they have represented them in some major cases.
Given the close connection between several close associates of top BH managers, some close friends of Warren Buffet, and...
people who've signed the "Giving Pledge" (i.e. Elon Musk is one of them)...
we may safely assume that adult advice for going private is very well in hand.
I agree. Thinking about where the piles of tens of billions are, BH is at the top of the list and really a better candidate than Apple or Google.
I was happy to see Charlie Munger's firm involved and wondered/hoped something with BH might be a possibility.
Charlie Munger calls Elon Musk 'brilliant' and bitcoin 'stupid and immoral'
Musk “swings for the fences”
Regarding Tesla, Munger said, “It’s already created more significance than anybody had predicted. Its founder is bold and brilliant, and he swings for the fences. People like that get some remarkable results. Sometimes they get some quick failures. I haven’t the faintest idea how Elon Musk will turn out, but he has a considerable chance of success and considerable chance of failure. He seems to like it that way.”
Munger said he hadn’t heard that Musk had tweeted that he was going to start a candy company in response to Buffett’s comment, “I don’t think he’d [Musk] want to take us on in candy.”
“I didn’t hear that. Sounds like wise-assery,” Munger chuckled. “I can’t criticize anybody else for wise-assery.”