Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Prediction: Coal has fallen. Nuclear is next then Oil.

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

Once disregarded as too low efficiency, perovskite gets its LFP moment.
There's a lot of chasing tandem/hybrid/heterojunction with perovskites.

Tandem is the big thing to be cracked in cost reduction as higher efficiencies have enormous value for residential rooftops or other places where space is constrained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mspohr
This needs to stop
.


Toxic emissions from the Canadian tar sands – already one of the dirtiest fossil fuels – have been dramatically underestimated, according to a study. Research published in the journal Science found that air pollution from the vast Athabasca oil sands in Canada exceed industry-reported emissions across the studied facilities by a staggering 1,900% to over 6,300%. Academics said this means that damaging reactive pollutants from the oil sands are equivalent to those from all other human-made sources across Canada with severe health implications.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DrGriz and fhteagle
Yes, that's what's happened in Australia, Germany and the UK.
And Hawai’i

The program is dead simple. No smart grid controls, no fancy grid stabilization services. The batteries are simply programmed to send power back to the grid every day between 6:00 pm and 8:30 pm. The battery’s stored power is first tapped to meet the needs of the household. After that, the battery sends its leftover power to the grid for use by others.

Participants get an $850 per kilowatt ($4,250) upfront bonus when they commit to the program for 10 years. They also earn a $5 per kilowatt monthly bill credit for the duration of their participation. That’s another $3,000 in monthly credits over a decade. In addition, HECO pays retail rate for the electricity exported back to the grid.



IMO Hawai’i needs Tesla’s VPP, instead of waiting for an official standard for controlling home batteries.

GSP
 

To reach its renewable energy goal, Ann Arbor is trying something that has never been done before — constructing a series of community owned microgrids while still maintaining a relationship with DTE Energy. The city owned assets would be bundled into what is being called a Sustainable Energy Unit or SEU. The city explains that, “The Ann Arbor SEU is a community-owned energy utility that provides electricity from local solar and battery storage systems installed on homes and businesses throughout the city. The SEU provides 100% clean, reliable, locally built, and affordable electricity; built by the community, for the community.”

This first of its kind project in the US aims to not only give citizens access to locally produced clean energy but also to overcome the grid reliability issues that plague DTE’s distribution network without having to invest a considerable amount of money in upgrades.

If Ann Arbor is successful, it could demonstrate that municipalities need not be beholden to the power companies that serve them. The audacious idea of skirting the utility’s control of the city’s energy provision has symbolic significance beyond Ann Arbor. According to Latitude Media, It shows that cities intent on decarbonizing their electrical supply may have options beyond the traditional utility model.
 
Ann Arbor may not be the first:


The Tribe is already on it. There is a crew of Tribal members who are now certified to install Tesla powerwalls and they have much of the town of Lapwai on solar. They are well on their way to having each home have rooftop solar and a powerwall.

They will be off the Grid as soon as possible.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave EV and DrGriz
My guess is permitting. Getting county/city approval to install solar+storage+net-metering takes almost forever in my area!

Or just competition. Bluetti are from Las Vegas, NV so may have seen greater market opportunities in Texas. They started at a backup battery company and there are good opportunities for batteries in Texas' competitive electricity market.
 
I disagree with this statement for at least a dozen reasons. But I won't list them out unless someone asks me to, so as to not completely derail this thread.
It seems that discussing alternatives to fossil fuels is appropriate for this thread.

Ethanol has been extensively investigated and most of the studies find that the emissions from growing, transporting, and processing feed stocks (primarily corn) and water use are insignificant whereas the environmental damage and the continued support of ICE engines are damaging.

In any case, farming may involve a decline in soil fertility due to reduction of organic matter,[82] a decrease in water availability and quality, an increase in the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and potential dislocation of local communities.[83

Health costs of ethanol emissions

For each billion ethanol-equivalent gallons of fuel produced and combusted in the US, the combined climate-change and health costs are $469 million for gasoline, $472–952 million for corn ethanol depending on biorefinery heat source (natural gas, corn stover, or coal) and technology, but only $123–208 million for cellulosic ethanol depending on feedstock (prairie biomass, Miscanthus, corn stover, or switchgrass).[87]

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: nwdiver and DrGriz
It seems that discussing alternatives to fossil fuels is appropriate for this thread.

Ethanol has been extensively investigated and most of the studies find that the emissions from growing, transporting, and processing feed stocks (primarily corn) and water use are insignificant whereas the environmental damage and the continued support of ICE engines are damaging.

In any case, farming may involve a decline in soil fertility due to reduction of organic matter,[82] a decrease in water availability and quality, an increase in the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and potential dislocation of local communities.[83

Health costs of ethanol emissions

For each billion ethanol-equivalent gallons of fuel produced and combusted in the US, the combined climate-change and health costs are $469 million for gasoline, $472–952 million for corn ethanol depending on biorefinery heat source (natural gas, corn stover, or coal) and technology, but only $123–208 million for cellulosic ethanol depending on feedstock (prairie biomass, Miscanthus, corn stover, or switchgrass).[87]

The disagreement wasn't about ethanol. It was with saying that soy-based diesel is as wasteful as ethanol.
 
The disagreement wasn't about ethanol. It was with saying that soy-based diesel is as wasteful as ethanol.
It's pretty much the same. Better in some areas, worse in others.
Probably the most underrated effect is that it keeps polluting fossil fuel vehicles on the road where they continue to burn fossil fuel blends and create pollution damaging the environment and human health.


The environmental impact of biodiesel is complex and varies based on factors like feedstock type, land use changes, and production methods. While it can potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, concerns about biodiesel include land use changes, deforestation, and the food vs. fuel debate. The debate centers on the impact of biodiesel production on food prices and availability, as well as its overall carbon footprint.

However, environmental organizations, for example, Rainforest Rescue[165] and Greenpeace,[166] criticize the cultivation of plants used for biodiesel production, e.g., oil palms, soybeans and sugar cane. The deforestation of rainforests exacerbates climate change and sensitive ecosystems are destroyed to clear land for oil palm, soybean and sugar cane plantations. Moreover, that biofuels contribute to world hunger, since arable land is no longer used for growing foods.