I'll let you figure that one out.. the 940 price was never a sustained price, but you use the data you want to draw the conclusions that suit you.. bud
Try starting at 1/1/2020... and go from there.
sure pick an arbitrary date to suit your narrative bud. Keep up the good work.
Well, picking TSLA's high is an equally arbitrary date.
Here's a fun table I threw together using other arbitrary dates.
First we have the daily highs from the days TSLA, F & GM all hit their 52 week highs.
Then the daily lows from the days they each hit their 52 week lows.
Then YTD, 3m, 6m and 12m performance (I used the daily opening price).
Then the daily lows from the days they each hit their 52 week lows.
Then YTD, 3m, 6m and 12m performance (I used the daily opening price).
All are relative to today's opening prices. It's really not hard to see that in spite of TSLA's drop from it's 52w high (also its ATH), it's still very much out-performing F & GM:
Personally, I worry about the performance of my TSLA holdings which is up 85%. They're up even more when you factor in the US$/CAN$ exchange rates on the days I purchased the shares relative to today. So yeah, if you bought in at $940 then I can see why you're not so happy, but otherwise $940 is just an arbitrary number too.