As I see things 50% compound growth applies to earnings and is a long term aspirational target.
It was explicitly covering both production and delivery though in Zach and Elons statements- not earnings. And explicitly about 50% or greater
this specific year not just a general average.
Troy earlier directly linked to the audio from the earnings calls making this clear- but here's an example from each quarterly call this year so far where they make this clear each time.
Elon Musk on Q1 2022 call said:
we remain confident of a 50% growth in vehicle production in 2022 versus ’21. I think we actually have a reasonable shot at a 60% increase over last year.
Production- not earnings.
Zach Kirkhorn on Q2 2022 call said:
despite losing more builds in Q3 than expected, we're still pushing to reach 50% growth this year
Builds is production, not earnings.
Zach Kirkhorn on Q3 2022 call said:
we're on track for the 50% annual growth in production this year, although we are tracking supply chain risks which are beyond our control.
On the delivery side, we do expect to be just under 50% growth
Production and Delivery. Not earnings.
It's pretty likely Tesla misses these targets for the year. There's multiple entirely reasonable reasons that's so, but it's still a miss from guidance.
50% compound growth of earnings may still be possible without 50% compound growth of vechicle deliveries.
Sure- but that's not what they guided for.
But falling short on an aggressive target like this is not a disaster.
Agreed. There's lots of entirely valid reasons to miss initial targets for a given year.
I can't see my missing 50% compound growth by a few percentage points should drop the stock price.
Well, in theory stocks are priced based on future performance, so if the price is set based on specific guidance of future performance, and they miss, the price dropping makes perfect sense.
But that also assumes a perfectly rational market, which is not a thing we actually have, so impacts are outsized and harder to predict.