Since the new holiday update includes enhanced visual assist parking it only makes sense people will critique how well it works. The swift kick in the rear is for Tesla who created the controversy to begin with.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
You’re first problem is living in upstate NY.
In a city whose college team nickname is named after a former president, the Orangmen.
ultra sonic sensors would provide the requisite proximity warning prior to foot-to-rear contact
insaneoctane
Well-Known Member
Certainly the robotaxi will require increased visibility? Can't have an autonomous vehicle assuming some cached data from X seconds ago is still accurate relative to small animals and possibly children? Probably been discussed ad nauseum in the past...
I've driven manuals in Europe in many places - none had any assist/vision system. None.
I am in a camp that think that whomever cries over non-having the sensors is a pansy. Last thing, you no likey Tesla, fine. Go get a Skoda (VW) or the iPace. Solved.
MartinAustin
Active Member
(It's the weekend, so...)
CNBC publishing "news" 5 years after it had already happened
www.cnbc.com
CNBC publishing "news" 5 years after it had already happened
Cruise is in danger of becoming GM's latest trendy venture that doesn't pay off
Cruise has quickly gone from one of GM's greatest business opportunities to a massive liability.
www.cnbc.com
It won't happen until a complete redesign is done. A whole new line would need to be set up at that point. I don't doubt it will happen sometime, but not very soon.
cliff harris
Member
Is this how you talk to everyone? Quickest ignore ever. Enjoy your 'everyone is a pansy' camp.
Mod: The discussion (if it can be called such) about parking sensors and surround vision shall cease now. Too much name calling. --ggr
Todd Burch
14-Year Member
Once the 48V architecture is ready for them, yes.
Thumper
Active Member
I wonder if the vehicle to residence backup power will make it to the S and X and 3 and Y.
Not unless and until there is a full refresh. If it happens it will be in about 5 years or so.
Overall, robotaxi will be much safer than a human. That's all that matters.
Yeah. Captain obvious strikes again.(It's the weekend, so...)
CNBC publishing "news" 5 years after it had already happened
Cruise is in danger of becoming GM's latest trendy venture that doesn't pay off
Cruise has quickly gone from one of GM's greatest business opportunities to a massive liability.
I hope so. It's a great selling point for EVs, which is important for the mission.
I think most of what is in Cynbertruck will eventually make it into Models S/X/3/Y that could happen in 1-2 years, or it might take 3-5 years.
Steer-by-wire will probably allow Model S/X sales again in RHD markets, lower production volumes make moving to new 48V parts less of a logistics issue.
Once Gen3 models are in production, 100% of vehicle controllers are in house 48V controllers and high volumes of 48V parts are being sourced, the additional parts required for Model S/X are not overly significant.
It may be that some internal lines to make parts specifically for Model S/X can be retired.
Model 3/Y are more of a challenge due to them being built in higher volumes and in multiple factories, my hunch is that Tesla will want Cybertruck and Gen3 fully ramped. Model S/X converted to 48V, and any other new models shipping, before doing major changes to Model 3/Y production.
Well... I got a Tesla Holliday Gift Guide!
navguy12
Active Member
I don’t want to lose the cm accuracy of what I currently have with the USS; I hope one can select either technique as a favourite.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
