Jebinc,
It seems like it is just you and me.
All the "investors" that want to believe lies, and refuse to look at the cybertruck (damn that isn't spelled right is it) critically, have left without acknowledging we (and a few others here) are right. They left because they can't accept the truth. They'd rather believe a lie. Or just ignore the truth.
And they pretended to leave because we said it already. Or we were name calling. But they kept trying to attack us and not the issue.
If any of em come back and can somehow show me something in regards to how the cyberTURD's back half is better designed than any normal truck I'd be flabbergasted. But they won't.
The whole turd missed the toilet really. Why I remember years back about how the body was going to replace the frame... and then it didn't. Everything didn't. The only two remaining features are the Stainless Steel that seems to be ideal for wrapping so that's not the big thing any longer, and the ill-designed Leaky, heavy, ugly Turdneau cover.
Metrics? ALL gone
Usability, only as an attention-getter
Size. reduced. Why? So it could fit in a garage...come on man. really.
Yolk? A joke. (And this is the only vehicle that has the correct "lock to lock" for it to work right.)
Ramp in the tailgate: "Oh we weren't serious. That thing would cost several thousand. And throw of the handling dynamics."
Tie down channels. No one that ever stood in the bed of a pick up even considered that as a good idea
Stainless Bed. No one that ever stood in the bed of a pick-up even considered that as a good idea.
And that four-wheel ATV that Elon said he would build if people expressed an interest and most of us did...well they made it (toy).
I really can't remember something done as poorly as the Cyberturd. From conception to this Final product. I mean minutes in to the initial reveal they cancelled the "Bulletproof" windows... That was one of the few truthful thing that has come from Tesla since the whole fiasco began. And then they lied about it. If it was Micro-fractures then the engineers could easily solve that. Cushion the edge. I only wish I had the Cracked window shirt now!
Right, and when they don't like the facts/view/Elon critique, or large group nicknames, they threaten to report the posts (when no Forum rules were violated). To these folks, I say,
"You do you... - To each!"
Re CT (where "T" stands for
<Insert your Favorite name here>), No disagreement with any of your above "factual" post points. That's why I call that clown a "Charlatan" - because he sure says and does things like a charlatan would (including selling snake oil).
P.T. Barum would be proud of him....
As mentioned,
<Insert your Favorite name here> reported many things that were not true right up to the "delivery event" debacle. Yeah, and that's what it was (a debacle). From faked 911 vs CT 1/4 miles (like he once staged those early FSD videos), calling the CT a "car" and the "vault" a "trunk" many times, misleading order page narrative (like those completely BS torque values and more). I only hope the stock drops low enough to force the BoD to replace him. Then the stock will rebound (after the initial "loyalist investor crowd" gets over the "loss")... To think, "'da clown" was even so bold to ask for a larger equity share of the company - delusional.
Re the crap of a Tonneau/Bed/vault design:
1) CT is the only "turd" I know of where you can't see out the rear window when the PoS is closed. Your choice is to see and have your stuff exposed to the elements, or to close (sh)it and not see - while still leaving your stuff open to the elements, partially.
2) The crap of a design takes away bed space - did you see that rear bed wall angled into the bed? Reduces usable bed space/loading/unloading for sure. And those dumb side "wings"....
3) In all seriousness, most tonneau covers let in some minimal amount of moisture at the corners, if exposed to wind and rain or other forced water pressure. Not sure how badly the CT tonneau "weeps"....
, even when I showed them 
