Krugerrand
Meow
Second base?
What’s on second base.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Second base?
I choose to believe that publications like...
... don't **** around with money or advertisers getting anywhere close to their journalists.
- The Wall Street Journal
- Business Insider
- Market Watch
- The New York Times
I mean, the WSJ took down Theranos while the publication's owner had a massive stake in the company.
The idea that there's some grand conspiracy that includes "big media" is just pure Trumpism.
Conspiracies don’t have to be grand. They can involve just a few people and even a mediocre amount of money.
Do you really not understand that?
Do you ever watch the news?
And I bet you would find that most at these forums are supportive of true journalism.
Most of us are techies, engineers, and scientists. We are not conspiracy theorists.
Go to the Flat Earth forum for that.
So you're saying that Business Insider committed libel then? They printed something factually untrue when they referred to "internal documents"?
And Tesla should sue them, right?
Come on guys...
Starting to seem like this forum is going full-blown conspiracy mode.
I get that conspiracies can be very simple and have a low amount of money.
... but what evidence is there? What evidence that Linette took money from Chanos and paid Tripp?
Isn't it simpler that Tripp was a moron, voluntarily leaked documents to Business Insider, got caught, and was fired?
Please don't. It's important to educate bystandersThe ignore button works wonders.
If Tesla actually had evidence that Linette paid Tripp, why haven't they released it? Why don't they just outright state the accusation rather than masking it in questions?
Lead a horse to water comes to mind...this one does not want to be edumacated.Please don't. It's important to educate bystanders
Business Insider defends their reporter:
Alyson Shontell on Twitter
Musk already firing back:
The answer why she won't go on record:
Because she has no obligation to do so?
Here, watch: are you guys 100% certain that Elon Musk has legal US immigration status? Why won't he go on record and say he's legal status? Why won't he post his immigration documents?
If Elon doesn't reply, it means he must not be here legally.
... Or, he has no obligation to respond?
Second base?
What’s on second base.
It's not to educate him. Apparently this forum has a big enough effect on the masses that we now have a wave of paid trolls.Lead a horse to water comes to mind...this one does not want to be edumacated.
Not that I'm a conspiracy nut (well maybe), but I think he was set up.And before you go all appeal to authority or she's so great, recall what happened to Dan Rather. Past performance is no indication of future correctness.
Great, wire shark is for network snooping.If someone here wanted to dig in on this further, there is some remnants of code and other stuff scattered around using the name 'martytripp'.
Timestamps on most of it show creation either last year or the year before.
Follow the link at the bottom of this tweet for one example.
Bonnie Norman on Twitter