You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder what they were actually testing. They chill everything they can for a normal firing. When running, the gas temperature in the throat is over 3000K. Does it matter if it starts at 30K in space or 300K in atmosphere? That represents an increase of 2970K vs 2700K. Perhaps they fully expected everything to be fine, but wanted the test to be sure.That is cool... that has to be some pretty amazing thermal shock...
Yes, I would guess that’s what they were testing. Stuck valves especially. And little tubes that could “ice” up with frozen oxygen or whatever.I wonder if they were more concerned about icing off the propellants while sitting at such low temperatures for a long time without running the engines. Stuck valves, chunks of material going through the plumbing, turbines and such.
There are nine engines for a Starship...
The name tells me that this is another Elonism of declaring aggressive aspirational goals. In other words, he made this up so his Raptor engineers have something to shoot for. Without a goal like that, his teams might just be content to pat themselves on the back for achieving 350 bar. It's the same as his Mars colony goals, his robotaxi goals, etc. In truth, it's like JFK telling NASA to get to the Moon "before this decade is out". Challenge your people. The best will rise to the challenge and achieve things they never knew they could.But the goals for the 1337 (leet-speak, lol), engine are pretty nuts... 450 bar??:
JFK had NASA. He asked them for a goal that the US could achieve and the Soviet Union could not. The NASA guys knew that the Soviet Union already had orbital capability via Korolev's rocket designs. But they also knew that a new rocket was going to be needed for anything beyond LEO. So NASA told JFK that the US could reach the Moon before the Soviet Union could. I assume they told him something like "If we pushed really hard and had the resources, we could do it by 1970".I'm sure JFK relied on some smart folks to advise him regarding the moon landing before the decade was out, but I suspect that was as much of a guess that it as even possible as anything.
Elon is competent in some areas, but aspirational in all. That's why some of his companies achieve such amazing results; where there is unrealized potential in an industry, his people realize it. Where there is no unrealized potential, his people beat their heads against the problem. Electric cars and reusable rockets are examples of the former. Neuralink and FSD are examples of the latter. Composite rockets would have been an example of the latter, and if Elon and his people had stuck with it, they'd still be beating their heads against that problem instead of digging holes with stainless steel super heavy lift vehicles.
So in the end, Elon sets aspirational goals all over the place. Where the technology is ready to go that far, his people will succeed. Where it is not, his people will fail. But as Wayne Gretzky is famously known to have said, "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take". Elon shoots.
Will his people ever reach 450 psi chamber pressures? Maybe. Eventually. I think it's an FSD problem, where it's the sort of thing that's possible, but nobody yet knows how to do it. So it'll require fundamental research by the SpaceX guys, and that always takes time.
Why? It was on the Merlin test stand and smoke was pretty sooty looking.
Because for some reason I overlooked that this was the Merlin stand.Why? It was on the Merlin test stand and smoke was pretty sooty looking.
It looked more like a test stand failure. Perhaps just a leak. The engine seemed perfectly fine, but there was burning propellant everywhere just as they fired the engine. At least, that's how I saw it.Assume this was a Raptor RUD:
New Raptor test failure (likely intentional)Because for some reason I overlooked that this was the Merlin stand.
Thanks for the correction.
I was just early!New Raptor test failure (likely intentional)
Looked quite engine rich. Possibly insufficient film cooling.I was just early!
Wonder what the chamber pressure was at the point of failure (if that's indeed what caused it...)
So, based on these frames at the moment of the RUD, it appears the engine is on the left, as that's where the explosion starts, and up that point the plume to the right tapers off in brightness.. in other words the engine is "firing" to the right:Looked quite engine rich. Possibly insufficient film cooling.