Causalien
Prime 8 ball Oracle
But no capital-gains tax, so on long investments with a good return, we win...
Ya, I've narrowed it down to Belgium, Spain, Italy or Germany. Just need to compare the tax scheme of each country now.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But no capital-gains tax, so on long investments with a good return, we win...
Of course, if they didn't hire a PR firm, the headlines would read "Elon goes it alone; another PR disaster predicted".SeekingAlpha editors are already labeling it as “well-known crisis communications firm” thereby implying that Tesla is in Crisis mode!
Well is it pretty obvious the Tesla PR people are totally overwhelmed. They need professional help. First thing Joele Frank needs to do is cancel Elon's Twitter account. But doubtful that will happen.SeekingAlpha editors are already labeling it as “well-known crisis communications firm” thereby implying that Tesla is in Crisis mode!
But no capital-gains tax, so on long investments with a good return, we win...
I am moving to Belgium! 25% capital gains tax in Germany.
In the old days Dutch private wealth fled to Belgium, mainly to escape the fixed tax on capital/property.30% here in France.
Well is it pretty obvious the Tesla PR people are totally overwhelmed. They need professional help. First thing Joele Frank needs to do is cancel Elon's Twitter account. But doubtful that will happen.
I agree with her estimates but at this point it seems the process of going private is almost irreversible
GarbisOnTheGoFyrir 2 klukkustundum
I would be very worried if someone would want to pick a Model 3 over an M3...
Svein HanssenFyrir 35 mínútum
Do you work for BMW?
GarbisOnTheGoFyrir 24 mínútum
Svein Hanssen i do actually yes but thats besides the point, i’m speaking on behalf of any true car enthusiast
LOL... I think we both know the odds of any "filtering" of Elon's early morning posts are less than zero. At this point could he even do more damage? I think people are becoming immune to his weirdness. It is taken for granted as part of his "baggage". The SEC could change that but otherwise, it will be Musk, as usual, going forward.Don't need to cancel it, just need to filter it. Elon posts to a PR/legal person, who either passes it directly through, discusses it with Elon or other people from Tesla before approving it, or rejects it - with the goal to be to let the vast majority through and only stop the "blunders".
Of course it won't happen, nor should it. He's done probably thousands of tweets with maybe a handful of Mulligans with the vast majority resulting in positive feedback and a few holes in one. Definitely way under par for the course.Well is it pretty obvious the Tesla PR people are totally overwhelmed. They need professional help. First thing Joele Frank needs to do is cancel Elon's Twitter account. But doubtful that will happen.
Well is it pretty obvious the Tesla PR people are totally overwhelmed. They need professional help. First thing Joele Frank needs to do is cancel Elon's Twitter account. But doubtful that will happen.
many with orchiotomieshttps://mobile.twitter.com/TrendTrader007
·
1m
Replying to @narutium
$TSLA shorts are in a state of prosapagnosia Once the deal is finalized they’ll be in a state of alexithymia
Okay, I gave you a "funny" for that!·
1m
Replying to @narutium
$TSLA shorts are in a state of prosapagnosia Once the deal is finalized they’ll be in a state of alexithymia
Boomer... "as he should be"? The SEC is all up in Tesla's you know what over his tweets. I agree the CEO should be the PR frontman, but not in Tesla's case. At least until they hire a COO, then put him/her on the front line of PR. I still believe the shareholders were wrong in not separating the CEO and Chairman roles. It would be interesting to do a recount and see how many would still vote the same way today.they’re not overwhelmed, they’re handcuffed and somewhat powerless, depending on the situation. EM is the PR, as he should be.
Boomer... "as he should be"? The SEC is all up in Tesla's you know what over his tweets. I agree the CEO should be the PR frontman, but not in Tesla's case. At least until they hire a COO, then put him on the front line of PR. I still believe the shareholders were wrong in not separating the CEO and Chairman roles. It would be interesting to do a recount and see how many would still vote the same way today.
Boomer... "as he should be"? The SEC is all up in Tesla's you know what over his tweets. I agree the CEO should be the PR frontman, but not in Tesla's case. At least until they hire a COO, then put him on the front line of PR. I still believe the shareholders were wrong in not separating the CEO and Chairman roles. It would be interesting to do a recount and see how many would still vote the same way today.
I don't understand her arguments:
First, as a private company, Tesla will be unable to capitalize on its competitive advantages as rapidly and dramatically as it would as a public company, an important consideration given the network effects and natural geographic monopolies to which autonomous taxi and truck networks will submit.Is she saying that Tesla won't be able to do equity financing? I think equity financing and leveraged debt got Tesla into trouble to begin with, it's what attracted the shorts who seem to have a ... willing ally at Moody's.
Don't think this is true: Elon has no trouble getting publicity as the CEO of SpaceX.
Second, in the private market, Tesla would lose the free publicity associated with your role as the CEO of the public company not only with the bestselling mid-sized premium sedan in the US, but also arguably in the best position to launch a completely autonomous taxi network nationwide in the next few years.
What he wants to avoid is the volatility and short-termism of public markets, which is in large part enabled by being traded on an exchange where the rules are in favor of speculators and financial parasites.
For example why isn't it public information who the biggest Tesla shorts are? Is it UBS? If yes, shoulnt they be barred from attacking Tesla through covert means, due to the obvious conflict of interest? The identity of the largest investors is public - why not the identity of the largest anti-investors?
I think the final straw for Elon were the 9% layoffs in June. They were entirely unnecessary and are disruptive, the layoffs were done to reach profitability faster.