More is more
Not always... and I'd say certainly not in a good way with that "H-Tron".
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More is more
Agree that the e-Golf could have been better if it had been designed only for a BEV drivetrain, but this isn't necessarily the case when considering real life practicalities. A dedicated BEV platform would likely be made in relatively small volume, and won't be designed as any other practical car (traditional car companies sadly have the idea that BEVs are something completely different), which means you might end up with an expensive weirdmobile. For instance, I would much rather have seen BMW make an all-electric 3-series than the i3.Not to derail the thread too much, but imagine how good the egolf could have been if they hadn't been limited by an ICE design? imagine a golf, but with storage space under the hood for example, or a lower centre of gravity, or any of a number of things.
Sure, they managed to kludge together a BEV that managed to have no additional negatives over it's ICE donor, but that doesn't mean it's the best EV they could have built, or that there aren't compromises made to fit the donor vehicle.
The E-Golf is not an ICE conversion though. That MQB platform was designed with the BEV and PHEV applications in mind. It's one example where if you design a platform with EVs in mind, it'll be better than an ICE conversion. An example of an ICE conversion is the Focus EV, where it loses a considerable amount of trunk space.How come the e-Golf tops the EV sales charts this year in Norway? It's a good car and conversions work well for shorter range cars. Please see this background article...
Green Car Congress: Driving the VW e-Golf; strategy, assembly in Wolfsburg, Braunschweig battery plant
...
A dedicated BEV platform would likely be made in relatively small volume, and won't be designed as any other practical car (traditional car companies sadly have the idea that BEVs are something completely different), which means you might end up with an expensive weirdmobile. For instance, I would much rather have seen BMW make an all-electric 3-series than the i3.
7 January 2016 - Hyundai Motor has unveiled the first photos of the new IONIQ – the next generation of hybrid vehicles, and the first to offer electric, plug-in hybrid and hybrid powertrains in a single body type.
IONIQ further breaks the hybrid stereotype through its entertaining driving experience, attractive design and advanced connectivity, matching the expectations and changing lifestyles of customers.
More information about the Ioniq today: IONIQ: A Leap Forward for Hybrid Vehicles Hyundai Media Newsroom
Seems the EV version won't be unveiled until the Geneva Motor Show in March, so about the same time as the Model 3. We'll have to see if it reaches customers in 2016.
If that's 155 EPA miles, that's pretty good. If it's NEDC, that's the same as the 30 kWh Leaf.
This article states a range of 105 miles. Hyundai Ioniq Electric Vehicles: Range and Pricing Details
If this is the case, I am disappointed. I was hoping for at least 150 if not more.The more I think about it the more the lower range value becomes believable. You really can't have a car designed primarily with an ICE in mind to be able to fit in a 50kWh+ sized battery when needed. So are we looking at closer to a 30kWh capacity perhaps!
Yep. The original article that reported 155 miles BEV and 32 miles PHEV was British. They also reported the HEV as 79 mpg. That's because they were using UK gallons and NEDC estimates for their local readership.This article states a range of 105 miles. Hyundai Ioniq Electric Vehicles: Range and Pricing Details
Assuming the Hyundai Ioniq has a decent range (practically a given due to the announced use of "next-gen LG Chem batteries") and no major quality issues I predict this car will sell very well in both the PHEV and EV variants in 2016+.