JRP3
Hyperactive Member
It is always going to boil down to theology.
It's never about theology and always about accurate terminology.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is always going to boil down to theology.
This thread is called "BEV" explicitly. Some people like to call a REx vehicle a "EV", but it certainly isn't a BEV.Well they are calling it a Rex so put it here.
This thread is called "BEV" explicitly. Some people like to call a REx vehicle a "EV", but it certainly isn't a BEV.
With range-extender: Not a BEVWhat is a BMW i3?
Not a BEV.How about a Mirai?
Which would make the overwhelming power source the battery pack.
Yes it is....The distinction between hybrid and BEV isn't based on percentages, of course.
lol, I stand corrected!Yes it is....
100% on battery = BEV
anything less = hybrid.
Yes it is....
100% on battery = BEV
anything less = hybrid.
Correct. I had the same thought after I could not edit the post any more. So here I also have to stand correctedStill not complete, the full formula:
100% on battery = BEV
0% on battery = ICE
anything in between = hybrid
Looks like Tesla has everyone beat thenAs carmakers overcome range anxiety with better batteries, they will no longer compete based on technology. Instead, they will appeal to emotions and brand value.
Looks like Tesla has everyone beat then
... As carmakers overcome range anxiety with better batteries, they will no longer compete based on technology. Instead, they will appeal to emotions and brand value.
...
They say this, and they still don't have a worldwide fast charging network. While Tesla does."The period of differentiating ourselves by technology is almost over," Saikawa said. "Then [it] will be a competition of how aggressively you can deploy the portfolio across the models. We would like to be on the aggressive side, the leading side."