Charley Grant of WSJ who demonstrates straight up animosity towards Elon hasn't tweeted since the letter
LMFAO
He's probably busy with his dad, checking on their friend Chanos to make sure he's okay.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Charley Grant of WSJ who demonstrates straight up animosity towards Elon hasn't tweeted since the letter
LMFAO
I’d even wear short Tesla shorts.Please, please have Tesla shorts as merchandise in stores worldwide. I'd wear them everywhere.
@mmdSummary:
1. 5k a week Model 3 is the new 10k a week. Kiss that 10k/week good bye. 5k/week enough to support Europe, China and US demand in Q1. Gotcha!
2. All talks about 10k a week vanished.
3. Was the $35k Model 3 contingent upon 10k a week Model 3 on a sustained basis? I think it was. So bye bye that too.
4. FSD bye bye.
5. $100 a KWh battery has been hyped up so long in the past. Gone. Won't comment anymore.
6. Solar roof tiles that was ready to sell 2 years ago is now in R&D and testing!
The only sad part is I can't find shares to short.
This is something we bought into when KSA didn't take the company private; we knew that would sequentialize some events to a degree when that announcement came out. They took the opportunity to decide to state at that time that they intend to fund all growth via revenue. They reiterated that today.They have to be disciplined with spending - if they are going to build a factory in China then they may have to hold off a little on lots of CapEx in Fremont in order to go from 7-10k per week… They want to stay cash flow positive every quarter going forward.
Another way to put it is they can't spread themselves too thin now, they'll have to prioritize between different projects that require spending where the pay-off is a bit delayed: China factory, build out of GF, build out/upgrading Fremont, Tesla Semi, development of Model Y, etc.
So it sounds like batteries are no longer the bottleneck. What’s holding them back from 6 to 7 k per month. Paint?
Well, he said he expects profits from repairing out-of-warranty cars. I suppose you wouldn't expect them to repair out-of-warranty-cars at a loss. I hope he doesn't mean high, gouging-level profits, but I'm fine with a 1% profit margin on out-of-warranty repairs...Change of strategy: Repair shop is to be profit center. Formerly Elon said the service was not to produce profits, but to break even in time. Now he foresees profits from repairs shops as the fleet ages.
Along these lines, someone here previous mentioned starting the Tesla Network early, with people driving manually for now, and using that to essentially drive further demand in addition to profits. That still sounds like a fantastic idea to me.
Not that I know of, but Tesla is alluding that FSD (full autonomous) is going to somehow be able to compete with other ride share services and I don't see that for 3+ years at least. Now, it COULD be they are planning to disinter-mediate UBER ride coordination, letting tesla OWNERS be DRIVERS and take less than the 25% spiff that Uber takes. that could occur I think, use your Tesla (with lower operating costs) to do ride share service, but if they haven't built that technology YET, I see that as 12-18 months out. It would be pretty cool though, for those tesla owners that have extra time on their hands.Are either expected to be doing autonomous taxi service in a widespread fashion any sooner? Clearly Tesla is not competing with human drivers today.
Frankly, I can't even see that as possible. The VOLUME of vehicles is soon going to be Model 3, all under warranty so there is basically no service revenue. They have a lot of legacy S and X in the market, but it will soon be DWARFED by the Model 3 in the marketplace, USA at least. So, how do they see Service revenue going up significantly? I mean, are they expecting to launch a model 3 service contract, that will add 500-900$ per car in revenue, for maybe 40% of buyers and with less than that amount in spend?
Is it just me or did Elon Musk sound pretty cold-blooded on that call? Like a "its-just-the-start-folks" kinda mentality to where Tesla's going in the next 12 months and forward?
They said Fremont downtime is to get Model 3 Fremont production from 7K/wk to 10K/wk; they said getting to 7K/wk is capital efficient, and 10K/wk will be more capital efficient than the initial 5K/wk.to 7k not 10k
For a factory currently producing 75 Million a day, a couple hundred million does not seem excessive.There's no need for you to repeat this same argument many times, we already know roughly how much capex is required for 8k-10k/week, independent experts from Evercore ISI recently audited the Fremont factory and estimated a capex in the 'tens of millions of dollars' range to reach 8k/week and 10k/week:
I'm sure they reported to Tesla with more precise estimates as well, but we don't have access to that report.
- “Based off our tour and what we saw, we see no reason why Stamping and General Assembly should not be able to handle [seven to eight thousand cars per week] today, and even potentially 10k units, with very little incremental Capex. We believe the same is also true for the Paint Shop when it comes to reaching 8k units a week, with some incremental capex potentially required to get to 10k units."
- "For Body, our understanding is that incremental capex is required (our impression is in the tens and not hundreds of millions) in order to get to both 8k units and eventually 10k units."
Correct.The difficulty now though, is figuring out *when you are wrong*.
Ah... but it doesn't unless you actually *do* that, and they're not doing that.This, however, is quite a bit more simple than specifying self-driving - and shadow mode is exactly this. It enables training of a network against baseline "perfect" human behaviour.
Summary:
1. 5k a week Model 3 is the new 10k a week. Kiss that 10k/week good bye. 5k/week enough to support Europe, China and US demand in Q1. Gotcha!
2. All talks about 10k a week vanished.
3. Was the $35k Model 3 contingent upon 10k a week Model 3 on a sustained basis? I think it was. So bye bye that too.
4. FSD bye bye.
5. $100 a KWh battery has been hyped up for so long in the past. Gone. Won't comment anymore.
6. Solar roof tiles that was ready to sell 2 years ago is now in R&D and testing!
The only sad part is I can't find shares to short.
Were you on the same CC that I was???????Summary:
1. 5k a week Model 3 is the new 10k a week. Kiss that 10k/week good bye. 5k/week enough to support Europe, China and US demand in Q1. Gotcha!
2. All talks about 10k a week vanished.
3. Was the $35k Model 3 contingent upon 10k a week Model 3 on a sustained basis? I think it was. So bye bye that too.
4. FSD bye bye.
5. $100 a KWh battery has been hyped up for so long in the past. Gone. Won't comment anymore.
6. Solar roof tiles that was ready to sell 2 years ago is now in R&D and testing!
The only sad part is I can't find shares to short.
Frankly, I can't even see that as possible. The VOLUME of vehicles is soon going to be Model 3, all under warranty so there is basically no service revenue. They have a lot of legacy S and X in the market, but it will soon be DWARFED by the Model 3 in the marketplace, USA at least. So, how do they see Service revenue going up significantly? I mean, are they expecting to launch a model 3 service contract, that will add 500-900$ per car in revenue, for maybe 40% of buyers and with less than that amount in spend?