Search results

Charging times for V2 are somewhat misleading. The cap there was about 120kw and if we judge by this video the max rate was sustained from roughly 8% up to 40%. Obviously this was not optimal. According to the chart from V3 Model 3 can be charged with over 120kw from 8% up to almost 60%. I...

That is true and I already pointed it out. It's even in the citation you included in your post. Tesla also does it but the buffer is smaller. As far as I know the real battery capacity of Model 3 is 80kwh, but the available is 75kwh. This chart shows added miles per minute and you know very...

Audi's package is inferior, but that is not the point. The claim here is that they don't have faster charging. As a matter of fact, they do, but this still doesn't prove their way of charging is better because of the bigger battery buffer they have. Still, e-tron charges from 0 to 80% for...

Seriously, why can't I edit my posts? This is frustrating.

If you really believe that then we must be reading different forum threads. The title clearly states that we are discussing different charging techniques, not cars. And no, Audi does not compare cars, it compares Audi's choice of charging method vs Tesla's choice. It has nothing to do with each...

P.S. Of course this cannot be done right now because there is no Model 3 with such a big battery and S and X with 90kwh packs cannot charge with 250kw.

Well it is not that hard. All we need is the time needed to charge e-tron's battery up to 100% and the time it is needed to charge a tesla 90kwh battery pack up to 88%(let's say from 10%). Nothing else really matters. If the Audi charges faster, then Tesla can only benefit from this...

There is absolutely no point in comparing added miles per minutes as this includes other factors in the equation unrelated to charging! What should be looked at is average added watts per minute for the total duration of the charging. However because of the Audi's battery reserve their 80kwh...