Search results

Still nothing on TestFlight :(

I don’t think that the problem is correlated to drive mode. On the first screen, for 80% real SoC, the BMS report between 42 and 44% and drops very fast while driving. When I reach 70% real, SMT switch from -1 to 140% SoC. It seems to be very linear and not depending if the vehicule is parked or...

Since 2020.20.12 update, the nominal remaining and expected remaining report wrong values. I’m pretty sure that occured just after the update because I’ve checked my SoH at this moment. Here is @ 80% SoC Now while driving @ 68%. Does someone have the same behaviour with this update ?

Energy buffer represents 4.5% of the Nominal full pack capacity.

And how the balancing of the cells looks like now ?

Your cell imbalance is huge at approx 100%. Try to leave the car to fully charged (it’s going to be long) and tell us if the Nominal Full Pack increase.

Mine. February 2019 AWD, 74,7 kWh, 17000 km and 490,38 km with a 100% SoC (304,77 miles).

You will have my money for this :)

Not completely a P3D- with 990 rear part but almost the same, only a 25 kW difference on the rear one vs a 980. That’s more than 60 kW on the front that throttles like hell. 3,7s 0-60 w/o rollout and 3,5s w/ is clearly achievable if we take into account the 3,2s time for a P3D advertised by Tesla.

Where are the bullshit suckers with their dumb stories about the 980/990 rear motor debate ?

Impossible n’est pas Français disait-il

That’s exactly what I expected with an uncorked front motor. With 4.1s 0-100 km/h there is still room for improvement and I think 2000$ is a bit overpriced. For that price, they should allow to go 3,7s 0-100 and 3,5s 0-60. But in any case, I will buy the package and test it with CAN to truly...

That was certainly too short to fully explain. You can speak with me in English, that will be easier for every readers. I was saying that in the previous test with older software (2019.32.12), I had a lower SoC approx 88% than with the 5% update (2019.36.2) with 99,7% SoC and I assume that will...

In France we usually say : Zorro has arrived.

With 2019.36.2.3 Software. Front Motor still throttle. Better SoC on this test but I assume that’s almost 10 kW due to this. Power improvement adds 15/20 kW to max overall peak.

25 kW on the rear one and more than 60 kW on the front... So that’s ok for the rear part. Don’t unleashed anything on the 990, but bring the full power on the front one, both are the same ! An AWD with 3.4 0-60 will be fine.

That’s quite simple. Put the evidences provided here such as videos or charts in front of him. He won’t be able to avoid the subject indefinitely.

This is exactly what I’m waiting for to make a new run test with CAN. But still no 2019.36 update for me at the moment :(

Yes, the test has been done on 2018.32.12.2. I will make the same to compare when the 5% boost is applied but on AWD, that will be a joke. Not a performance update but roughly a performance unlock on the front motor. The overall maximum peak should raise to 330 kW from the battery.

The AWD Model 3 is perfectly capable to be modified in Performance. That’s mostly a software throttle on the front motor to appears less quicker than the Performance version.

New report from France. AWD delivered on February but I guess produced in 01/19. 990 Rev B