Search results

Thanks for the explanation, I will think about that! :)

I do mean kWh / 100km WLTP consumption, you can average it out. a.) I've seen many different values, thats why I wrote 13-16.. for example this site shows the same magnitude: https://ev-database.org/car/1591/Tesla-Model-3-Long-Range-Dual-Motor WLTP Ratings (TEL) Range 614 km Rated...

As I know, it's false. WLTP range is based on 13-16 kWh average consumption. It means 13000W-16000W average consumption by the car. If you want 3.5% range drop, you need to increase the consumption by at least 455W. It's not just an Atom to Ryzen 15->45W (30W increase), and also not just the...

3.5% drop in WLTP range? Ridiculus.. 13-16kWh WLTP consumption is only upped by at most 200W (GPU+CPU), which is 0.2kWh. So 13->13.2, 1.5%. IF its always on at 100% load.

Ryzen has Navi 23 GPU, which can eat at most 160W (TDP), the CPU part uses 30W more than the Atom, so at most 200W difference. It's 0.2kWh. Basically the Model 3 uses 13-16kWh on WLTP, so its at most 1.5% loss, not 3.5%, like it was in the news..