Search results

No more words needed:

I'm having the same problem: When the front left door is wide open, the rear door won't open, only the window moves down a bit. When the front door is only slightly open or closed, the rear door opens normally. I suspect that the door harness of the front driver door is broken inside the door...

Normally I only charge up to 80% SoC. But I can monitor the range @100% as Teslafi extrapolates it even when the charging session stops earlier. The 100% charge I mentioned above was AC. I cannot find a correlation to AC or DC in my data. But due Corona I'm charging AC mostly. I extracted the...

Yes, I'm still getting additional range back without doing further updates. But I made a mistake in my earlier post, I'm already on 2020.24.6.11 since 30/07/2020. In summary, the regaining of range started with 2020.20.17 and accelerated with 2020.24.6.11. The pumps are running at high SoC, so...

Still on 2020.20.17, I did a full charge to 100% SoC. I got another ~ 2 kWh back (349.5 km = 217 miles) Additionally, here's a screenshot of ScanMyTesla showing the cell voltages shortly before the end of the charging session: The battery pack now has 187,000 miles and is still the original...

Yes, that's correct. Before the capping with firmware 2019.16.2 the reading for "usable full pack" via ScanMyTesla was ~68 kWh, the worst after the capping was 59,9 kWh. Now, 50.000 km (31.000 miles) later, it's at 63,8 kWh.

With 2020.20.17 my S85 also started regaining some capacity. Here's my Teslafi battery degradation report (it's showing kilometers, not miles).

Step 1 just happened: Tesla Announces Offering of Common Stock | Tesla, Inc. I somehow doubt that step 2 will follow ;-)

Thank you for telling your experiences. But I wonder what your "Usable Full Pack" or "Full Typical Range" was before and after installing 40.2.3?

i also see my range dropping again.

You should keep in mind that the numbers in this chart are in km, not in miles. So the total drop in 38,250 km (24,000 miles) is just 22 km (14 miles).

Don't know the exact model, but the owner stated the following on Facebook (rough translation via Google Translate): Then I asked him how the fire happened and to which SoC the battery was charged at the time of the accident. His answer: Source: TESLA Enthusiasten D-A-CH

Done. I've added two columns F and I and renamed the other columns. Do these changes fit your needs?

I pulled the fuse of the rear left door handle. I afterwards started the 2019.28.2 update and it failed after 7 minutes. So in case anyone wants to do the same, the fuse is located here (brown, 5A), remember it's best to pull the fuse when the handle is retracted ;-)

A Tesla owner in Germany received a written explanation concerning the firmware based capacity loss and uploaded it on facebook. It was made available to the service center by Tesla-HQ and unfortunately it has been poorly translated into german before it was handed out to him. (IMO the last...

I fixed the first row and column G and protected them, so they can't be edited anymore. To filter, the viewers now have to create their own private filter view which doesn't have an impact to other users.

My bad, editing is now allowed too.

I'm the owner of this sheet. I can reassure you that it was not intentional on my part. Seems when first sharing the sheet I simply forgot to check the checkbox "Prevent editors from changing access and adding new people". I saved a screenshot with a list of users who added permissions for...

Your translation is correct, but that doesn't explain the higher tapering at 80% and above. At this SoC, the cells should have reached the same temperature in both charging sessions. Nevertheless, more feedback would certainly be helpful.

Beware: The update 2019.28.2, which is rolling out atm, further reduces the charging speed. Left curve is 2019.28.2, right curve is 2019.24.x Source: German Tesla Forum: 85er Akku : Reduzierung der Ladeleistung seit 2019.20.1 • TFF Forum - Tesla Fahrer & Freunde

@willow_hiller : no matter which color the chart finally has: It's perfectly showing that by capping the maximum cell voltage deliberately in Firmware 16.2, in one day the car lost more range than in 130,000 miles before.

@bhzmark: To be precise, the dotted line depends on the option you select below the graph. My selection is starting vs. current range. I would expect that the ownerof the p85dl has selected High Range vs. Low Range. The lowest reading of 244 miles might have occured at a charging session which...

The dotted line is drawn between the starting value and the most recent data point. Nothing more and nothing less. My TeslaFi battery degradation chart looks like this. All values in km, not miles.

I can totally confirm this. X axis represents Typical Range in kilometers.

How do you feel about these statements? When I read those lines, I wasn't sure if Tesla is really interested in a quick solution. Neither are they willing to roll back the changes nor is a timelime available for updates "fixing" the issue. It's worth noting that it's already T+ 6 weeks after the...

Electrek already has published an article about the issue: Tesla owners see battery range drop after software update to 'improve longevity' - Electrek Now we know it was an intentional measure and not a "bug".

The capacity continues to drop (S 85 12/2014).

The voltage read at 100% SoC now is 392V, as reported from the BMS of my Model S 85 RWD (2014). They did cut off the capacity at the upper end.

We have collected some data about this issue in the german tesla forum (tff-forum.de). Tesla Degradation FW 2019.16.2 Furthermore, with Software 2019.20.1, the overall charging rate at the supercharger has declined. I already can confirm this for my S85, but still collecting more data about it.

Anyone read the line stating "While you drive, Autopilot now captures a continuous picture of the world through radar. When combined with data from other vehicles in the fleet, this will enable a significant enhancement to emergency braking capabilities in future releases." If I get it right...