Note that the sample return sounds just like the Mars sample return mission, and the relay setup is just like Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and the Mars rovers.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Discussion of China in Space
- Thread starter Grendal
- Start date
That kind of mission really isn’t in SX’s wheel house. Long duration, ‘deep’ space, high reliability, low quantities/mass.
The non-rotation (of sorts) of the moon also means that orbiting comms are really only required for far-side operations. Anything near side generally first-principals to surface mounted comms. Anything that’s landing has to have to-earth comms anyway, so it’s not like there’s extra stuff to bring down that you could otherwise leave in orbit.
This WSJ article positions China’s lunar exploration missions as a “race” with the US, and Bill Nelson’s recent Congressional testimony does as well, with national security implications, as that is the way he can get more money for NASA.
China Launches Moon Mission in Base Race With U.S.
He has a point, but practically speaking there is no way that China enforce such a claim. And technologically, China’s hardware initially will only enable two taikonauts to spend a few hours on the lunar surface before departing in contrast to Artemis’s plan for two astronauts to spend up to a week. Of course it is inevitable, in my opinion, that China will continue to make significant progress in building more capable rockets and human-rated vehicles.
It won’t be long before there is a Congressional majority that starts to insist that NASA be given more funding for Artemis. It’s the early 1960’s all over again…
I cringe at the thought, but there are a few differences today:
1. We have the 1960s as a lesson from which to learn.
2. We have a more purposeful goal than just setting foot on the Moon.
3. We have SpaceX, Blue Origin, and others.
The worst case will be the government pouring money into this stupidity so that politicians can sate their needs for prestige, then pull the rug out from under the entire effort. That would replicate the essence of the 1960s. Fortunately, we already went through the 1960s, so there should be enough people who can steer the politicians clear of a 1960s repeat. But those same politicians may get creative and come up with a different way to achieve the same idiotic result.
The best case will be that the government will move only as fast as commercial spaceflight companies are prepared to move. If the Chinese want to pour their resources into a prestige project, let them. Leave the slow and steady progress to the West, where they'll establish an industrial base that would make access to space a real and lasting part of our lives.
I wonder how long it would take SpaceX et al to land people on the Moon if the government didn't tell companies how to do it and only said that they'd pay to have it done. How about a simple contract that sets the price per kilogram delivered to the surface of the Moon, and another set price per kilogram returned to Earth? From there, they can start working on the economics of robotic missions, manned missions, and so on.
Does anyone want to do the math for cost per kilogram to the Moon based on the cost per kilogram to LEO? Starship is aiming for $100/kg.
Impressive. China’s Chang’e-6 probe lands on far side of the moon aiming to return first samples to Earth
Article includes a video of the landing that China posted on X.
Congrats to the Chinese rocket scientists who made this happen! Now for the hardest part; returning lunar samples to Earth.
Article includes a video of the landing that China posted on X.
Congrats to the Chinese rocket scientists who made this happen! Now for the hardest part; returning lunar samples to Earth.
China’s Chang’e-6 lunar probe returns world’s first samples from far side of the moon
It’s an impressive accomplishment!
That seems unlikely given that China and the US currently essentially have zero cooperation in space-related activities (very difficult after the Wolf Amendment) and Xi’s hyper-nationalism.
As I understand it, they plan to send samples to other countries. I just didn't know if the US was on the list. The US and China still have many ties in science, technology and industry.
China launches Sino-French astrophysics satellite, debris falls over populated area
China launches Sino-French astrophysics satellite, debris falls over populated area A Chinese launch of the joint Sino-French SVOM mission to study Gamma-ray bursts early Saturday saw toxic rocket debris fall over a populated area.
spacenews.com
My understanding is that happens often with Chinese launches, right?China launches Sino-French astrophysics satellite, debris falls over populated area
China launches Sino-French astrophysics satellite, debris falls over populated area A Chinese launch of the joint Sino-French SVOM mission to study Gamma-ray bursts early Saturday saw toxic rocket debris fall over a populated area.
Washington Post article: China says U.S. can’t stop it from taking ‘giant steps’ in space (behind a paywall)
Hopeful sign?
However;
He may be right, but since the US Congress has made it so difficult, one can see why the Chinese could feel aggrieved.
Ars technica Rocket Report:
And that is just one example.
China is a decade behind SpaceX in reusability, but it recognizes how important a goal it is. ESA, on the other hand…
Last edited:
I was thinking about that just as it reached apogee. "Okay, time to explode now."
It would be interesting to learn how the rocket blew through the holddown mechanism. Was it a failure of the rocket structure, the holddown mechanism, or the foundation itself? See tofu dreg projects. Were they using a launch lock mechanism (e.g. not a physical bolting down) and accidentally commanded a release? Meaning either somebody pushed the wrong button, software accidentally sent the release signal, or some hardware fault trigged it.
This is another example of the upside to meddlesome government regulation.
Similar threads
