Sure, at some point with a software update that may be possible, but that's not really the issue. The issue is that you are trying to charge a battery the size of 5 power walls off of 3. You are going to drain the capacity of the powerwalls and have nothing left to power your house or offset your peak demand. Also, you are loosing and additional ~15% efficiency (on top of the minimum ~15%) by doing a second DC->AC->DC conversion to charge one battery from another with AC inverters and a power supply in between.
If you put your HPWC in front of the gateway, you are still using excess solar to charge if you have production, but more likely you are going to program the vehicle to charge at night off of very cheap and abundant base load generation that is otherwise wasted. The solar and powerwalls are meanwhile powering your house and reducing your daytime and peak demand to near zero. The only thing your power company sees is the low-cost demand at night when your vehicle is charging. If you really want to cover yourself for driving to the grocery store during the zombie apocalypse, install chargers both before and after the gateway and have both options. Or maybe some kind of Dr. Frankenstein looking giant knife switch that changes the source breaker for the HPWC from your main panel to the CL panel.