Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

GM, Tesla, Nissan & Others Form Coalition To Reform EV Tax Credit

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Come together, right now, for EVs.

Getting the various manufacturers of electric vehicles to agree on something has, in the past, been challenging. A single high-speed charging standard springs to mind. Now, though, it seems there has been a joining of hands on the issue of the federal tax credit. Tesla, GM, Nissan, and a number of other companies and organizations have come together to form the EV Drive Coalition in an effort to reform the electric vehicle tax credit program.

Started when President George W. Bush signed the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 into law (as part of the more sweeping Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008), the legislation currently gives electric vehicle buyers a tax credit of $7,500. After a manufacturer sells 200,000 vehicles eligible for the program, a phase-out stage reduces the credit amount by half, and then half again, before finally ending altogether.

Tesla has now reached that 200,000-vehicle threshold, and GM is quickly approaching it. To help electric vehicle uptake keep (and hopefully improve) its momentum, the program needs some changes. This is, as you probably have imagined, where the EV Drive Coalition comes in.

According to a press release (below, in full) issued today by the new group, it wants to build on the success of the program by removing the 200,000-vehicle cap. We, of course, wish them good luck with their mission. And while we wonder just what kind of reception the effort will receive from the current Congress, we know there are at least some elected officials they should be able to get on their side.

 



EV DRIVE COALITION LAUNCHES TO REFORM & RECHARGE

ELECTRIC VEHICLE TAX CREDIT

Urges Congress to pass electric vehicle tax credit reform

Washington, D.C. (November 13, 2018) – The EV Drive Coalition, a broad coalition with a

focused goal to reform the federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credit, today announced its official

launch as Congress convenes for its lame duck session. The EV Drive Coalition brings together

a diverse group of industry, consumer and environmental stakeholders with a single unifying

mission: encourage passage of legislation reforming the federal electric vehicle tax credit to

ensure that it works better for more consumers for a longer time frame and spurs increased

growth of the U.S. EV market.

The original electric vehicle tax credit, which goes directly to consumers not manufacturers,

catalyzed the market, increased consumer awareness and grew a nascent industry. To promote

continued market growth and stabilization, members of the EV Drive Coalition are advocating

for reform to lift the current cap on the number of consumers who can take advantage of the

credit through each manufacturer.

“Arbitrary constraints with the federal credit limit consumer options and make it harder for

consumers to purchase the cars they want,” explains Joel Levin, Executive Director of Plug In

America. “Lifting the cap would create a more level playing field for all manufacturers, giving

consumers the freedom to decide which car they want in a free and fair market. Increased

competition spurs more American innovation and technology”

“A federal tax credit to help make electric vehicles more affordable for all consumers is integral

to reaching a zero emissions future and establishing the U.S. as the leader in electrification,”

said Dan Turton, Vice President, Public Policy at General Motors North America. “We feel that

the tax credit should be modified so all customers continue to receive the full benefit going

forward.”

“A reformed tax credit will affect more than those who purchase electric vehicles,” reassured

Janet Peace, Senior Vice President at Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. “While a

mature EV market will be a boon to the American economy, it will also play a major role in

reducing greenhouse gas emissions, a significant contributor to climate change. This would be a

win for consumers, for the economy and the for environment.”

“We’ve been able to make tremendous strides in the underlying technology of electric vehicles.

The battery power and the range have improved significantly over the last few years. With every

new advancement, we get closer to becoming an economically sustainable market. However,

we’re not there yet, and keeping the cap will have a negative impact on a sustainable U.S.

electric vehicle market,” explained coalition spokesperson Trevor Francis.

This is an urgent issue. Choosing not to reform the tax credit will severely hinder America’s

ability to compete in a global market. “At that point, it wouldn’t be just an automotive issue. As it

stands now, electric vehicles are responsible for nearly 300,000 jobs. This is a jobs issue and

an economic issue in addition to a consumer issue,” emphasized Francis.

A reformed electric vehicle tax credit will ensure the domestic manufacturing, infrastructure and

market of electric vehicles continues to grow. Electric vehicles are the way forward and the EV

Drive Coalition will work to ensure a flourishing, mature and cost-competitive U.S. EV market.

To learn more about the coalition, its members, its mission and the proposed legislation, visit

www.evdrivecoalition.com/home.



This article originally appeared on Inside EVs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Additional info in the Engadget article.

Tesla, GM and Nissan will fight to maintain EV tax credits together

This bit is most interesting:

"Legislation tweaking the credit cap has been introduced in both chambers of Congress and could form part of a potential push to extend expiring tax credits during the lame duck session of Congress that begins Tuesday, according to Bloomberg."

Unlikely to get done so quickly but what a Christmas present to all of us procrastinators. Of course, if this were to happen there would be endless threads here from people who rushed to get delivery before year-end complaining about how they got screwed and the rest of us don't deserve the full credit.
 
https://www.evdrivecoalition.com/s/EV-Drive-Coalition-Launch-Press-Release_FINAL-8bz4.pdf

This push allows the counternegotiation or compromise point to offer the credit for a fixed calendar time, rather than per manufactuerer production count as it stands today. Another negotiation point the push hints at is allowing the credit to be structured in such a way that it is not tied to the tax return of the buyer, but to the seller, so that they can be guaranteed the accruement of the benefit at point of sale and thus make the purchase price capable to be lower at initial buy point for the buyer. Finally, by doing this as a coalition, they can state that the existing companies that invested in this transition put a lot of money into this already, so the other companies that didn't yet come to the fore with EV investment and adoption shouldn't expect to get as much credit as the old system said they might have gotten had they come to the fore sooner: they get what they pay for.

The end negotiation point may be something like a calendar year phaseout over the next half a decade to a decade of a welfare for EV's that is realized in such a way that EV buyers could use a single price point during purchase without having to file extra paperwork at tax time and without having to wait for a tax incentive later on; the welfare would be applied during time of purchase, and it would be equal for all manufacturers regardless of EV manufacturer that the person buys. For instance:

$7,500 per new EV per US Citizen tax credit to the manufacturer for 2018-2019;
$5,000 per new EV per US Citizen tax credit to the manufacturer for 2020;
$2,500 per new EV per US Citizen tax credit to the manufacturer for 2021;
$0 2022 and after.

Thus, a $60,000 Tesla Model Y ordered in 2019 would get a purchase price of $52,500 (plus taxes and fees) at the point of purchase; the buyer would not have to file any further tax documents after the point of purchase. (They might have to file some purchase-point tax paperwork, such as proof of citizenship, etc.). Similarly, a Honda Electric Vehicle bought in 2021 would get the $2,500 discount for citizens, same as any Tesla. The welfare would disappear in 2022, and stop being a tax burden to all tax payers.

This theoretically would continue to spur electric vehicle purchasing and electric vehicle market share, and make the conversion of the energy system to clean energy faster and more economically sturdy since it would not happen at such glacial speeds without the incentive. Upgrading neighborhoods to triple the amount of electricity formerly available from the grid would not take as long to pay back since more people would adopt EVs sooner. Upgrading home solar and business parking lot solar systems to charge cars would not take as long to pay back since more people would adopt EVs sooner. This is a case of making the upgrade a bit faster makes it a bit more affordable.

This is all theoretical, and I offer it as theory.

The libertarian side of me says that there are too many regulations against competitive power companies, too many regulations against solar panel installation, too many regulations against battery manufacturers and energy systems, and therefore, removing most (but not all) of that regulation would have a superior effect compared to the above welfare system, but this welfare system idea is where we are today and what we're contemplating, so I'm putting it out there. (Ideally, in a more libertarian regulatory environment, neighbors could get together, group-buy solar panels to put on a few of their homes, dig underground ditches between properties and under streets to put in underground conduit to distribute that solar power among the homes, perhaps share or not share costs of batteries installed, neighbors could help each other install the panels, batteries, and conduits, and none of them would pay a damn penny to the government or the local utility, nor have to ask for any permission, nor wait for inspections except as after-the-fact enforcement and liability. Only communists would be against this.)
 
Last edited: