36) Environment and Public Health; Forest Management
View attachment 496059
If there was ever an example of how the mission of an agency can influence its policies it's the
US Forest Service vs the NPS. National Forests are set aside for public use and enjoyment. If you've ever been on an awesome ATV trail that maybe cost $3/day that was probably a national forest. If you've ever gone mountain biking with your dog in rugged wilderness that was probably a national forest. National Parks on the other hand are intended for preservation. A NP is like an art museum while a National Forest is like a petting zoo... where you might be able to harvest one of the goats of you buy a permit
National Forests are one of my favorite places to go. They're FAR less restricted than parks. I've always hated that dogs usually aren't allowed on any trails in a park. There's ~300,000 mi^2 of national parks that are available for practically any use public or private. Obviously you need approval to mine or harvest timber but both are done frequently and it's up to the forest service to ensure its done sustainably.