You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That land that SpaceX is trying to get their hands on may be related. I doubt they want to put the new tower there, because it's entirely in the west of the site, but they may want to clear a space in the east end and don't have anywhere to put the stuff they take out of there.I wonder when we are going to start seeing excavation and pile driving begin for the new tower base and second OLM? Those preparations are going to take months to complete, I would think. I wonder why SpaceX moved those tower segments to Starbase so far in advance.
It’s a complicated story and I won’t attempt to summarize it here. The article includes the same graphic that @JB47394 posted upthread. I found it curious that the parcels in Boca Chica State Park northeast of the village that are planned to be given to SpaceX are scattered and not contiguous. The article states:The state is now proposing giving SpaceX 43 acres of Boca Chica State Park in exchange for 477 acres near a national wildlife refuge in South Texas – the same land Cameron County had been eyeing.
Both deals would protect the larger parcel from encroaching development. But with the swap, orchestrated by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, SpaceX gets public land for its fast-growing empire in a delicate part of South Texas.
“It makes the optics look even worse,” Kathryn Tancig, a conservation attorney with Tancig Law, said of the overlapping plans. “If this particular land already had funding available, and was on a path to conservation, then perhaps TPWD should have been looking at other unprotected land to acquire in exchange for the 43 acres.”
The land swap has not yet been approved, but at a public meeting Texas Parks and Wildlife Chairman Jeffery Hildebrand said he was committed to completing it. On Friday, the department said it wants to convert the land to a new state park.
The Parks and Wildlife swap is likely a speedier and more lucrative transaction for the landowner, Dallas and Nacogdoches-based Conservation Equity Management, which is not directly listed as the owner in public documents and has remained quiet about the deal.
So the map showing the park area is misleading; the park includes private property?The 43 acres at Boca Chica State Park are split among multiple parcels that aren’t connected, and most of them are surrounded by private property, said John Shepperd, executive director of the Texas Foundation for Conservation, a fish and wildlife advocacy nonprofit.
Yeah, it's just a region, not exactA new Houston Chronicle article about the land swap: Texas says SpaceX deal will create a new park. But the land was already targeted for conservation. It is behind a paywall but I was able to read it in Apple News.
It’s a complicated story and I won’t attempt to summarize it here. The article includes the same graphic that @JB47394 posted upthread. I found it curious that the parcels in Boca Chica State Park northeast of the village that are planned to be given to SpaceX are scattered and not contiguous. The article states:
So the map showing the park area is misleading; the park includes private property?
View attachment 1015510
Paywalled for me, but hopefully that doesn't put a serious crimp in SpaceX's plans...
Note that this is about the Texas state constitution. There is an Open Beaches Act, which grants the public free and unrestricted access to Texas beaches.
I wonder if people getting access to beaches could significantly impair SpaceX's operations. I also wonder if the state of Texas would amend their law to allow SpaceX to do their thing despite the proximity to Boca Chica Beach. I also wonder if this is nothing at all, and just another dumb lawsuit.
Here's the full text of the act, for you lawyers.
A new Houston Chronicle article about the land swap: Texas says SpaceX deal will create a new park. But the land was already targeted for conservation. It is behind a paywall but I was able to read it in Apple News.
It’s a complicated story and I won’t attempt to summarize it here. The article includes the same graphic that @JB47394 posted upthread. I found it curious that the parcels in Boca Chica State Park northeast of the village that are planned to be given to SpaceX are scattered and not contiguous. The article states:
So the map showing the park area is misleading; the park includes private property?
View attachment 1015510
In Elon's January presentation, there was a brief animation showing the two towers side by side. That agrees with the 2021 launch site layout map. Digging up the parking lot may be for something as mundane as installing light poles.Beginning of prep work for the second OLM/launch tower?
I was relying on Elon's presentation and then dug around for supporting evidence.But that map appears to show two LZs, and as far as I know that is no longer the plan.
Seems about the right size. Since it appears likely that the suborbital stand will be removed once the new Massey’s stand with flame trench is completed, that will leave room for a new tank farm..RGV Aerial Photography shows that the entire parking lot area has been cleared of asphalt and they also believe that it is for Orbital Pad B
Rigs were drilling holes for "drainage wicks" to remove the ground water, so the very first steps are being taken. Here's a link to some footage from the latest Marcus House video showing the drillers working.I wonder when we are going to start seeing excavation and pile driving begin for the new tower base and second OLM?