I just did some similar math. My app says I charge 20% at SC, and se 4000 kWh per year, so $800 * .45 (California's exorbitant cost and I’m usually mid day o. Road trips), so $360 total x whatever the margin is. But, every non-Tesla is pure added margin, assuming to date the network was built out for Teslas only. Going forward, that will likely change.Lots of cheering, but what does this deal imply? I'm missing some analysis of the financial implications.
- How often will the average Ford/GM EV driver supercharge per year? Most charging is done at home, because it's more convenient and cheaper. I'd estimate 10 times.
- How much does the average charge cost? I'd say 70 kWh. At $0.30 that makes about $20.
- What is the profit margin on this? 60% perhaps? $12 in profit then. So we get to $120 of profit per EV per year.
- How many EVs will be driving around in the US in, say, 10 years? One hundred million, including Teslas?
Assuming all other brands also sign up that's $12 billion in profit (of which 2/3 was not yet accounted for, the Teslas were). Capital costs and maintenance will take that down to maybe $10 billion. Assuming there's a P/E of 20 for that part of the business that makes for $200 billion in market cap. That's 60 points. A lot, but I suppose not enough to get us to an ATH.
Other implications: Tesla loses a very big moot. But Tesla also becomes a household name for EV drivers who visit the Superchargers and that may lure people to the brand.