Recent content by sinv

There will always be confusing marks, or partly even unmarked sections. In such cases, the driver must be alerted immideately. This the current system doesn't seem to do. As the system is additionally unable to detect stationary obstacles, it must, in case the driver doesn't immideately react...

The AP never warned.

This seems how it happened. The AP drove it into the barrier.

How can Tesla advertise like this: Automatic Emergency Braking Designed to detect objects that the car may impact and applies the brakes accordingly Front Collision Warning Helps warn of impending collisions with slower moving or stationary cars In my opinion this is clearly misleading, at...

Thanks for the link, didn't know that document. However, they have reached this under laboratory conditions so this worth nothing under real world circumstances. And again, this is an easy job compared to vision. And much more difficult is understanding as they also wrote. So I think my thesis...

This is just a dream and probably impossible. Still today even speech recognition is far below that what a human can do. And this should be much easier to solve via neural nets. And here we are talking about safety relevant functions. Such only be implemented if the input sensors are robust...

Thank you for the link. However, if this is the case, who really thinks FSD can be reached with this? Seems absolutely impossible for me if they still cannot detect stationary objects. I also would really like to know about a real statistic research, not compared to average accidents, but...

How is it possible that the Tesla AEB doesn't see such an object? Is it such a crappy system?

Yes, nothing against you. Of course this wasn't foreseeable. However, I already considered it as very unlikely that the director of such a program would leave at such a critical phase (first implementation of HW2) without anything happened. I more guessed that his project results did not satisfy...

Really good terms... Tesla is suing its ex-Autopilot director for allegedly poaching employees and stealing confidential information

In my opinion the expectations are way too high. It is just not possible to gather sufficient safety from so many sensors. Typically such high safety targets can only be reached by extremely robust sensors, and typically you never should use more than 3 of them (otherwise impossible to certify...

The cost advantage of China is far more than only cheap labor: lower energy costs lower environment protection standard lower safety standard for the machines and people in the workshops

In my opinion Elon did and still does do a big mistake regarding the autopilot and the autonomous driving future: he raises expectations which then cannot be fulfilled. On the mid-term this will lead to customers with wrong expectations which always is a bad thing.

How come that 85 percent of TSLA shareholders voted for the merger? Did Elon vote himself?

I agree to your thesis. But this all is already priced in. The current stock price can only be justified if the main targets become reality. I also don't see much risks during the next 2 years (this does not mean that the stock price will go up further ) . However after this time frame I see...