-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
FredTMC
Model S VIN #4925
Of course they did. They have always reported GAAP Revenue and Profit.
They also provide non-GAAP numbers. Non-GAAP is very important for Analysts and investors. Growth stocks are usually evaluated based on non-GAAP numbers.
Furthermore, Tesla just discontinued their Residual Value Guarantee program. This simplifies things for Tesla financial reporting
The editor put a much nicer title than I did for the article
It's not just "people" (retail traders). Hedge funds and their algobots react to headlines almost instantaneously. The ordinary people who get taken down are often weak longs with stop loss limits who are toppled by hedge fund tactics that trigger a cascade similar to toppling dominoes.
C
Last edited:
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
These "concerns" are a joke. By the time any sort of rules or regulations are passed banning the use of the words, Tesla's AP feature set will actually be self-driving.
Who cares what the vehicle code in California says?
Rules are for losers.
Marketing is more important than following the vehicle code.
On another note, some other cars are competing with Tesla by marketing that their car gets 178 MPG where they are defining "MPG" differently than how the vehicle code does.
O
"The inaccurate and sensationalistic view of Autopilot put forth by this group is exactly the kind of misinformation that threatens to harm consumer safety.”
Perfect description on the dishonest media and "expert" organizations
"The inaccurate and sensationalistic view of Autopilot put forth by this group is exactly the kind of misinformation that threatens to harm consumer safety.”
Perfect description on the dishonest media and "expert" organizations
This is hardly an "old issue".
The comment letters were released to the public the day before Thanksgiving. Not even a week ago.
The SEC usually releases the comment letters 20 days after the matter is closed, but for some reason, in this case it took them 40 days to release them.
People here love to blame the evil shorts for any decline, even if the evil shorts have no significant impact.
It is a lot easier to blame them than think that saintly longs are selling shares.
In my opinion Elon did and still does do a big mistake regarding the autopilot and the autonomous driving future: he raises expectations which then cannot be fulfilled. On the mid-term this will lead to customers with wrong expectations which always is a bad thing.
CALGARYARSENAL
Member
Tesla needs to start letting the lawsuits fly. Sue everybody (with money) that posts lies. Enough is enough.
Well, actually if they just start running some ads, that might do it.
MitchJi
Trying to learn kindness, patience & forgiveness
TAN is down about two percent, TSLA about 3.5 percent.
At the close TSLA is minus 3.34 percent, TAN minus 2.02 percent.
At the close TSLA is minus 3.34 percent, TAN minus 2.02 percent.
Last edited:
RobStark
Well-Known Member
I think there is just too much information out there for people nowadays....no one stops and thinks about reading more than one article on the same subject. Add fake news on Facebook, etc, and people can get away with these types of headlines. It seems the truth is a burden now and has slipped from our hands as a society. Tesla really needs to extinguish all the lies.
MitchJi
Trying to learn kindness, patience & forgiveness
Disagree. Don't worry about it. The truth will win out eventually. In the meantime it's another buying opportunity.
Speaking of advertising ... this photo was taken in April 2015 back when Tesla say they don't pay for advertisements. A friend spotted this few months before I took the photo. Just wondering how true that claim was back then. Sorry for brining up such old topic but just curious ever since.
Photo: Ohio ramp to 90/94 Chicago.
Attachments
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
