Search results

Tesla Inc. is not a startup.

So I finally checked about this "Supercharging" and apparently its "a maximum of 120 kW per car". And CCS 2.0 "charges up to 350 kW in the range 200 - 1000 V." So I see that "Superchargers" are slower than CCS 2.0, or am I missing something here?

Of course I want to see reviews and videos of testing of the Mission E before making any serious judgements, nonetheless my point stands and you may stay hung up on the "gamechanger" comment. Also, I don't own any products from or have any other stake in either company. If this is modest...

I see. You might want to look at the comment by Webber a little bit more casually, because that's what it essentially was, casual. It wasn't some official press release one sees on a product page etc. This is a simple thing which you are elevating. But of course its promotion, hint, its an...

Do you keep mentioning "game changer" just because Webber casually said that in the Mission E video?

There already is a thread on Mission E and a post with Webber's track ride.

I'd like to see some examples of that. This thread's Audi BEV was revealed in autumn 2015 and it was stated that it would enter production in 2018 which is on schedule.

Which is absolutely normal. You better provide some sources on this alleged (by you) vague "warp speed development cycle" to be taken seriously.

Obviously none have been sold since its not on the market yet..

Their market cap is ludicrously inflated. And specifically, its preorders, and they need to convert to actual sales before they mean anything tangible. Increasingly profitability? They are not profitable even now, so increasingly doesn't apply. Would a healthy, profitable, viable Tesla create a...

Its still a business, whether or not one buys into a "cause" speech. The "thriving viable business" comment is ironic because Tesla is the opposite of that, even if one denies the numbers and events within the company this decade. Eh, Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning started a good company...

Your post might as well be a marketing phrase. They are a business as a main objective. Tesla is not some vanguard to develop BEV and electric transportation by a long shot. Many might be blinded by the barrage of media hype that the company gets to not see the wider world.

I think that the production vehicle obviously will not have "exhaust ports", I reckon they are in these test vehicles to not draw attention to the fact that its Mission E if they're on the road, possibly? It doesn't have them on the website Tribute to tomorrow. Porsche Concept Study Mission E. |...

"They are using the CCS connector and while Porsche claims that it already has the backend to support 350 kW charge rate, it can currently charge at 50 to 150 kW until vehicles can support higher charge rates. They had to develop a new transformer in order to support the charge points." It does...

Right, I hadn't checked the number of their dealerships. You avoided my other questions.

"The Walmart charging stations are part of a broader Electrify America project to install 2,000 chargers at nearly 500 charging stations across the country by June 2019." If you look at the map below you can see that its quite similar to Tesla's network. And why do you posit that those locations...

Inductive charging? Brilliant

You just posted dozens of photos of absolutely horrible workmanship. These faults are unacceptable, recall-tier. "I feel like I am just paranoid" What are you on about?