Search results

1) I discharged often to sub 0% . But I never charged immediately after to 100%. I charged often to 100% , but usually on trips . But, when I dropped it to 0% (or when I charged to 100%) I never noticed a direct influence on NFP. (at least not in the next immediate period). Nor the temp is a...

I add: 61000 km. Yes, usually I charge for what I need for 2 or 3 days. SO, When I'm able to charge regularly from 20-22-25-28% to 60% the NFP goes UP. When I change style , the BMS reacts And Yes I'ts me. I was Unhappy because of 79,6 kWh when new and 73,9 kWh 11 months later.

Just an Update on my 2021 Model 3 Performance (E3LD 82,1 kWh Panasonic Battery) Scan My Tesla Nominal full Pack graph taken daily from day 0ne (13/03/2021) to today.

My contribution (just this morning): M3P 2021 Panasonic 82 (US) with stock 20 Wheels SMT : NFP :75,5 SOC: 39,8 FRR: 477 km Range 190 km Switching to 19": NFP :75,5 SOC: 39,8 FRR: 489km Range 195 Switching to 18" ---->same values as 19": NFP :75,5 SOC: 39,8 FRR: 489km Range 195

I have to disagree (even if I consider you a guru along with others here in the board ...). You EIVISSA defined in the your board (the german one) that the BMS of the 82,1 kWh battery is a DEEVA! Mine is for sure a Deeva with its fluctuations! Based on SMT ( OK it's not the Bible....) but when I...

Never changed the to 19 or 18" I use SMT and I monitor NFP , at end of the day i update the Excel . I was so happy because the last 6 months the car started to show a relatively constant value on NFP (77kWh to 78kWh). Now in the last 2 weeks (since 25 april when I re started to charge in AC) I...

Simply Scan My Tesla... Those are NFP figures day by day since day one

About degradation is curious that I had my over 50,000 left FREE supercharger km EXPIRED at 25 April 2023. My car is a 49000km old M3 Perf (march 2021, 82 kWh Panasonic 2170 cells), charged from end of march 22 Exclusively at Supercharger from 10-20 to 55-60%. So I started again to charge with...

I tried the same (re-installing the same 2023.6.8 by Service Mode on the screen) . There is a button on Service Mode that allow you to reinstall the current update version. Nothing changed

This happened just after 2023.6.8?

Just installed in the past night the 2023.6.8 update. Something went wrong (sure for many Italian Owners). It seems they changed the constant and/or mixed some value (km with miles calculations). Something in the equation is wrong. The energy screen is displaying 1,5x to 2.0x consumption. If...

Yes, always sentry OFF during night. Yes sleeping sub zero and sleeping over 90%. Following days , if the trend was Donward, it continued to be downward, If the trend was Upward, it continued to be Upward regardless of actions I made letting it sleep at low and high SOC. Basically I'm usually...

I tried 3 times to recalibrate the BMS to stop some "not believable" NFP reading , 2 times when the NFP was in a strong DOWNtrend and 1 time when it was in UP-trend. Discharged and left sub 0% , charged to 100% and left at about 90-95% some hours then discharged again. But all the times if a...

Just an update on my Tesla Model 3 Performance (march 2021 with exactly 40.000 km). The rollercoaster continues: 77,0 kWh NFP and 486-487 km Range. Basically always Supercharged since April 2022 Up to 58%-max 60%. More (up to 90% 95% if during trips) , but at the first rest always under 55%.

just contacted Amund Børsand @amund7 . I hope he will reply fast as usual.

I write here even if is not directly related to "Range Loss over Time....." I have the new 2022.36.02 and SMT is now Crazy . I lost NFP and SOC's and all related data. Just an an example of flickering data:

Thanks @AAKEE . Yes, you are right but i can't do it (yes I can, but if I have not a really need to do a long trip there is no a good reason to waste 500km or 75 kWh). But even thinking to try it, I see a pair of uncertainties. In my opinion it has to be performed whithout a stop. so in a real...

An Update on my 2021 march Model 3 P with 82.1 Pana Batt. The rollercoaster continues.

if you put -3% this means that you are with 3% more than intial capacity? BTW you can connect the car to ABRP and have many parameters related to your actual car (Tesla Password needed). The degradation in ABRP (at least for my 2021 Model 3 Performance W/20") is not really correct because it...

An Update on the ROLLER COASTER of my 03/2021 M3P with E3LD 82.1 pack. (31K km today) I wanted to see where it ended to rise. It stops to raise up to 79,6 (just like when new), and I had no time to perform a 100% charge because when I decided to, it started to plummet at 1 kWh "chunks" every day...

I've made a XLS sheet where you can customize NFP and Wh/km constant and see the True SOC and actual Km left compared to battery range icon km. This is due to 4,5 % buffer. NFP and Constant are editable to suit different Model 3 models and battery sizes. Unfortunately I'm not able to upload the...

Sincerely i don't know the Average SoC and Average temp. A tesla Guy (when I was concerned about my NFP at ONLY 73.9kWh after 10 months) said it was around 37% Average SoC. Basically here the temp averages about 10 to 12 more °degrees than Sweden. About MIC MP3 battery I don't understand if...

Could you quantify the magnitudo of the "fell" and the "resurrected" ?. And, at lower value, for how many time it stayed "low"? And when "resurrected" which level reached? anf for how many time it stayed "high"? Just curious to know if you speak of a "resurrection" as mine MP3 that recovered...

@AAKEE AAKE I really thank you. You are always so accurate. I have to plan a similar drive to 0% let it sit some hours and charge to 100% to check the real NFP and Nominal Remaining of my car. Today i reached 79,5 kWh..... It was 73,9 kWh from mid february to mid march. I think that 73,9 was...

Have you left the car sleeping to invoke OCV when at 100%? Or you drove it directly to under 55%. And when at 0% have you left the car sleeping some hour?

Just now with 0,15kW load

Thanks, I used 4 Michelin Pilot Super Sport (old tires DOT 2016) just before to install the PS4S . They were with better feeling (stiffer sidewall feeling) but obviously they were a bit slippery due to age. Definitively I preferred the Pilot Super Sport, but in the wet they were very dangerous.

Are stock toe setting figures OK? Front: OUT 0.05° +/- 0.15° Rear: IN 0.20° +/- 0.15°

2021 Model 3 Performance originally equipped with stock 9" x 20" ET34 Uberturbine and Pirelli PZero. Not amazed by this combo I changed rims with Lightweight 8.5" X20 rims. I continued with Pirelli PZero and the handling was way better than before. When finished the outer side of the Pirelli...

Like I said , I'll charge to 100% when the UP-trend will stabilize or starts to decrease. YES 😅 ...probably a Tesla Ranger during a night replaced the battery... 😂

What I wrote friday: "I always charged from around 15%-20-25% to 55%-60%. so the car slips 2 to 3 hours at 55%-50% 45%.... until i recharge. ------>>What changed in the last 6 weeks is that i have no more a safe way to charge in AC at home during night. So, I charge from a free AC Tesla...

An Update: reached 79,00 kW and 501 km Range It's good to see again 250 km at 50%, 125 at 25% and or 285 at 57%...

Yes bizarre behavior... I hope is a true better BMS calibration. I plan to see when it stops to climb to perform a 100% charge and see the nominal remaining. I'm a bit ashamed to say the way I'm charging since last 5 or 6 weeks . My routine of the use of car never changed. I do 5 or 6 little...

An update on my march 2021 Model 3 Perf with E3LD 82.1 FPWN. probably in my last update of 7/10 days ago it was near 77,8-78 kWh with BMS that recalculted capacity from a low value of 73.9. Here the today score: 78,7 kWh and Range at about 497-498 km. 227-228 CAC

You can install Scan My Tesla and you can (at least) see how many kWh have been charged with DC (Supercharger or Fast chargers) and with AC in the history of the car.

I don't know if I have the time to do a similar test. I could try if i find a day when I'm at 30-35% Soc and only 150-170 km left. Driving only to consume battery is not fun if you know that you have to end near a charger. the battery continue to recover: Yellow is when I performed the sub 0%...

I made this try not for a particular purpose of Range recovery . so I have saved very little SMT screen. When It was still fresh in my mind I've posted here in this Thread or somewhere in the TMC. I remember of som 3.050 mv somewhere but I don't remember if in motion or in P . I have started the...

unfortunately during this test i've only a screen of SMT when at -1,56% SoC and same -1,56 SoC expected. In this precise moment and car in P and displayed 3,3 kWh buffer (at 73,9kWh NFP the buffer is less than usual 3,6kWh) the Nominal remainig was 2.2 kWh. So perfect in line with caculations...

When I was at "only" 73,9 kWh I performed a sub zero% trip to a Tesla destination charger just to see if any additional millivolts were left. The 0km left appeared just crossed the 0% SoC Expected The maesurement (with SMT) was in line with the fact that 73,9 was the real capacity and that no...

Sure, but the point is: if the capacity is not really changed and I'm able to respect the constant Wh/km while driving , IF the "raised by Software" kWh are FAKE i'll end the juice before to be at 0% ....

I'm for the 2 scenario (or a mix of the whole 3 scenarios). It's because I'm receiving feedbacks from italian friends with my same battery and same age and all are experiencing raise in the NFP (or calculated range at 100%). A freind of mine (with a 2021 3rd Quart Model 3 Perf , just sent me a...

My car is a Freemont made in USA with the 82.1 E3LD batt (1154423 -00 T). It's a 1st Quarter (delievered in Italy in March 2021). I really don't know if MIC or Made in USA. I have connected SMT 140 km after the delivery and the capacity never passed 79,6 - 79,7 kWh. only one time passed 80,1 kWh...

I really don't know if temp has a rule. Sure yes but not directly linked . I'm in North Italy and the winter can be real cold with always under 0° C (32°F) at night with january the coldest month . But I had the other max value in january (77,8kWh) and the worse values in february/march when the...

I have not fully undertand: I was thinking you were charging the car to 55% at night and START to use the car immediately after the end of the charge (or as fast as you can). Then you say that you had to change habit letting it (instaed) sleep another 1,5 to 2 hours before to use it to go work...

My last post on this thread was in February/March (I think). I was a bit warried and not happy because of the NFP displayed by SMT. Battery is a 82.1kWh Panasonic E3DL on my Model 3 Performance 2021 (march) . In February it was low to 73,9 kWh and it stayed to 74/73,9 for a full month ( or 5...

Yes ... 52%. I made an error. The displayed SOC in the screen is the SMT SOC Expected.

Yes you are saying things that make sense about SOc Min /max and buffer I have no Scrren of SMT but like I said some post ago YES, 3,052 (min) to 3,070 (max), 18 imbalance when car was stopped and me out of car with the car consuming 0,32 kW , so not sleeping [ALL of this at -1,56% SOC.) For...

Here my SMT with mine at around 0%. It was a moment where I was deciding to stop OR to go lower sub 0 %. (in real I allowed to go -1,56% SOC and -1,56% SOC Expected) This is the frame at -0,28% SOC (just used some buffer) What I don't understand are the values SOC UI, SOC Min SOC max ...

I want to do it a day... the only concern is to do the 100% to 0% (or even to -4,5%) in a single trip. Stops will screws the results. Today I discharged the car to 0. What I obseved is that cell imbalance were near 40 to 50 mV when at 5 or 6 or 7%, so I decided to go near zero to monitor...