Daniel in SD
(supervised)
To get similar amount of “tuck” you want less offset in the back. Look at the stock wheels, the back is more inset.Been following this thread but haven't seen any latest activity/pictures.
Am looking for a square set-up for my soon-to-be-delivered M3P and currently preferring the option of of 245/35/20 . Being based in France the tolerance if a variance of +1.5%/-2% of original diameter.
Side note: 255/35 puts me out of that tolerance range (+1.9%), and 265/30 (largest width I think is reasonable all around for a daily driver) is a smaller diameter (-0.8%), which will then further lower the car (planning on coil overs from MPP)... last option considered was 245/30/21 but tire options are rare (higher prices then) and less practical (everyday use and even track)
Anyone with such a set-up? (245/35/20 ET +35)
Second dilemma is the offset. It would appear from research that ET+35 all around is good, but front can take ET +30.
So the questions are:
1. Would you go for a different offset front and back (knowing that eliminate the front/back rotation)
2. Go for same offset all around and either:
a. Live with the slightly more tucked-in front wheels
b. Add 5mm spacers at the back
Thanks in advance
265/30R20 35mm is what you want for a square setup on a P3D+. Personally I would go with 19s or 18s though. You could add 5mm spacers in the back to get a similar tuck if the lugs are long enough.