AndrewBissell
Member
Finally Coda start to talk up their one selling point: 150 mile range. For ages they said "100 miles", presumably to be conservative. But with 36 kWh battery versus 24 kWh in the LEAF they needed to differentiate - if they said "100" and Nissan said "100" who I'm the general public would be paying close attention to the different conditions applying to this two different "100s" (one real world, one Japanese 10-15 drive cycle).
So I am happy that Coda finally talks up their strongest point. It gives them a positioning similar in range (but with a lesser status car) to the bottom end Model S for about $12K less. Or about 1.5 times the range of a LEAF for $10K more.
Also happy that they offer 6.6kW charger. (there seems to be an error in the article - the 1.3 kW convenience charger can't recharge 36kWh in 12 hours - must be 24)
Would I buy one? If I didn't yet have an EV and lived in California I would cross shop it with LEAF, Volt, Rav4-EV (depending on price) and Model S 160.
So I am happy that Coda finally talks up their strongest point. It gives them a positioning similar in range (but with a lesser status car) to the bottom end Model S for about $12K less. Or about 1.5 times the range of a LEAF for $10K more.
Also happy that they offer 6.6kW charger. (there seems to be an error in the article - the 1.3 kW convenience charger can't recharge 36kWh in 12 hours - must be 24)
Would I buy one? If I didn't yet have an EV and lived in California I would cross shop it with LEAF, Volt, Rav4-EV (depending on price) and Model S 160.