This is getting a bit off-topic but do you think there is a reason why the Prius has outsold the Civic hybrid?
I'd like to think it's the difference in the hybrid systems. The Honda system basically replaces the flywheel with an electric motor and leaves all the other old fashioned car part alone. So you have the hybrid parts and the conventional parts. Toyota has dumped a bunch of the conventional parts--in particular the automatic transmission with its hundreds of parts has been replaced by a simple planetary gear system.
Why did you chose the Prius over the Civic?
I originally chose the 2001 Prius my wife drives because the only Honda was the original Insight--two passengers, manual transmission, a non-starter. When Toyota offered the Pioneer Program to get a 2004 Prius I bought it sight unseen because the 2001 Prius was so good and I really wanted to dump the horrible VW TDI--I could have almost purchased a Prius for what I spent on maintenance for that turkey.
My 2004 Prius MPG from the logbook. (Complete years only):
2003-2004 -- 50.8 mpg 17,628 miles
2005 -- 52.6 mpg 14,688 miles
2006 -- 56.3 mpg 16,174 miles
2007 -- 57.3 mpg 18,384 miles
2008 -- 59.9 mpg 21,755 miles
2009 -- 61.4 mpg 16,177 miles
2010 -- 65.2 mpg 12,134 miles
2011 -- 66.9 mpg 11,272 miles
My thoughts are the Prius does not look like the typical econobox? If Toyota made the Prius look exactly like the Corolla or Yaris etc I do not think the "Prius" model would be nearly as popular.
That may be true. The hybrid Camry isn't nearly as popular. Then again, it might just be that most people who are buying a hybrid only look at the mpg rating.
I think that this may be the problem with the Coda, it looks like a $13,000 dollar Kia.
You certainly got me there