Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Commercial Crew update thread (SpaceX, Boeing, Sierra Nevada)

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
No I don't have any updates, unfortunately. However, I did come across this informative writeup from Aug. 3, 2012 with a few things that I didn't know (such as Sierra Nevada truly is more of a backup and will not undergo a critical design review under the current contract).

http://www.spacenews.com/article/boeing-spacex-and-sierra-nevada-stay-race-commercial-crew

Figured a separate thread was warranted for this topic, sorry in advance to any mods who disagree!
 
I think that Dream Chaser fly top of Ariane 5 as soon as Liberty flies. (e.g. never)

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2014/01/dream-chasers-european-deal-opens-ambitions/
A lot more info on this, including:
While Mark Sirangelo, corporate vice president and head of SNC’s Space Systems, believes his vehicle is winning the NASA race - one where Dream Chaser is pitted against SpaceX’s Dragon and Boeing’s CST-100, SNC is placing its fingers in many other pies, in order to fully utilize their spacecraft’s future aspirations.
Glass half full, anyone?
 
A few articles relating to Commercial Crew in general, rather than focusing on one company in particular:

Obama Administration Extends International Space Station Until at Least 2024
http://blogs.nasa.gov/bolden/2014/0...ernational-space-station-until-at-least-2024/

Year in PReview: 2014 will be a crucial year for commercial crew
http://www.newspacejournal.com/2014...4-will-be-a-crucial-year-for-commercial-crew/



And since thus far not much from Boeing, here in one so they don't feel left out in this thread:

Aerojet Rocketdyne Successfully Completes Launch Abort Engine Development Testing for Boeing's CST-100 Spacecraft
http://www.globenewswire.com/news-r...-Testing-for-Boeing-s-CST-100-Spacecraft.html
 
Here is a nice summary of the program as it stands today from Nasa, including this part of the program that I didn't know about:

She also emphasized the need for the spacecraft to be able to serve as a lifeboat for the International Space Station, something that no other American spacecraft has done since the Skylab program in the early 1970s when an Apollo spacecraft remained docked to the station for less than three months. An ISS lifeboat needs to stay in space for many months at a time.
NASA, Industry Discuss Launching Astronauts from U.S. Soil | NASA


Also, I guess Blue Origin is still considered a partner of Nasa for Commercial Crew, even though they didn't receive funding in the latest round. Here is an update:
http://www.nasa.gov/content/blue-origin-test-fires-new-rocket-engine/#.UtPysvRDtSI
 
Another old article from 2012, but gives a nice executive summary of what the various companies were up to at the time, much of which is still relevant:

Beyond SpaceX: Five companies seeking to change space travel - Sierra Nevada Corporation - CSMonitor.com

- - - Updated - - -

Sierra Nevada update:

The highly anticipated confirmation that Dream Chaser will be taking up residency at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) was finally made public this week, albeit with a few welcome surprises. The “baby orbiter” will be processed in the Operations & Checkout (O&C) building, ahead of a “committed” debut launch atop of an Atlas V rocket in late 2016.

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2014/01/dream-chasers-ksc-vision-2016-debut/
 
Interesting analysis of Commercial Crew from a Nasa budget perspective:

Who will get the ax? Boeing, with its experience running the gauntlet of NASA rules and regulations? SpaceX, with its extremely cost-effective, now-proven rocket and capsule combo? Or Sierra's Dream Chaser, a space plane shot on an Atlas V rocket with roots in NASA? No matter who is trimmed, it will be a heartbreak to the space community.

Is the Relationship Between NASA and Private Space About to Sour? - Popular Mechanics
 
Date for reveal of the "Dragon mk2" i.e. SpaceX Dragon crew capsule, from Elon's twitter acct:
Sounds like this might be a good time to unveil the new Dragon Mk 2 spaceship that @SpaceX has been working on w @NASA. No trampoline needed
...
Cover drops on May 29. Actual flight design hardware of crew Dragon, not a mockup.
The trampoline reference is regarding Russia's deputy PM's recent Twitter msg:
After analyzing the sanctions against our space industry, I suggest to the USA to bring their astronauts to the International Space Station using a trampoline
Trampoline to Space? Russian Official Tells NASA to Take a Flying Leap - NBC News
 
I've got to admit, I'm a huge fan of the SNC Dream Chaser. It appears to be a far more capable spacecraft than the capsule designs Boeing and SpaceX are doing. It has greater cross-range landing capability, subjects its occupants to lower G-forces during reentry, and has built-in hybrid fuel rockets for on-orbit maneuvering and other uses (such as flying safely away from a booster failure).

Plus, it actually looks like a spaceship.

SNC seem very determined to make it work. They've said Dream Chaser is happening even if they get cut from NASA's Commercial Crew program. They've said they're partnering with the Europeans. They've got a deal to land their ships at Houston. First unmanned orbital flight is penciled in for November 2016.

A reusable booster from SpaceX could revolutionize space flight. If that happens, it only makes sense for Dream Chaser to launch on a SpaceX booster eventually. IMHO that would be the killer combination. The only thing on the horizon that might compete would be Skylon, if it ever flies, but it's much riskier and further from being realized. (And even if Skylon gets real, in some ways it would be less versatile.)

We could have had new ships flying before now if the Congress would let NASA spend their money the way they want, instead of "earmarking" large portions to pork barrel projects like the Launch Pad To Nowhere, SLS, etc.