You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, because it's missing context. You need ~4,000 gallons of water to get the lithium (that can be recycled) for an EV but >30,000 gallons to produce the fools fuel (that can't be recycled) an ICE would need to travel the same distance that battery would over its life. CONTEXT.
Lol, no they don’t. The break-even point is much much higher, like you missed a zero.
The article OP posted is FUD-spreading garbage, but it’s not entirely wrong. Producing EVs emits massive amounts of carbon. Almost always net positive vs. an ICE over the life of the vehicle, even with dirty electricity sources - but it’s not a panacea.
You glide silently out of the Tesla (TSLA.O) showroom in your sleek new electric Model 3, satisfied you're looking great and doing your bit for the planet.
Lol, no they don’t. The break-even point is much much higher, like you missed a zero.
The article OP posted is FUD-spreading garbage, but it’s not entirely wrong. Producing EVs emits massive amounts of carbon. Almost always net positive vs. an ICE over the life of the vehicle, even with dirty electricity sources - but it’s not a panacea.
Even if it were 50k for all EVs, most cars will be driven much longer than that making it a massive net positive difference. That ICE hobby horse is dead and beaten.