Recently, EVtripplanner added selections to allow selecting some of the newer models to be mapped. YAY!
But I fear the information for the MS60D is in error.
Compared to the MS60, the efficiency on the same trip (with no charging stops) is 20% lower than the MS60D. The difference between the MS75 and MS75D is about 2.5%
OK,so maybe that is old data for the old MS60. But I would expect the MS60D and MS75D results to be close to identical -- they are physically exactly the same, after all. But the MS60D comes out about 8% better than the MS75D on the same 200 mile trip.
I WISH my car did that well, but it just doesn't. Has anyone else noticed this?
But I fear the information for the MS60D is in error.
Compared to the MS60, the efficiency on the same trip (with no charging stops) is 20% lower than the MS60D. The difference between the MS75 and MS75D is about 2.5%
OK,so maybe that is old data for the old MS60. But I would expect the MS60D and MS75D results to be close to identical -- they are physically exactly the same, after all. But the MS60D comes out about 8% better than the MS75D on the same 200 mile trip.
I WISH my car did that well, but it just doesn't. Has anyone else noticed this?
