This may have been covered before, but I was wondering if the performance of the S was somehow made uniform with the three battery options?
If not, then there is a potential performance boost going with the smaller battery which must be 300-500lb's lighter than the 300 mile option.
If true, and assuming the 5.6 sec. 0-60 is with the big one, then 0-60 could come as fast as 4.9 with smallest battery option.
I can't find it now, but I want to say I read the S with 300mile battery was 4000lb. (at 4000lb, 300lb savings is worth about .4 sec)
So would anyone get the smaller pack to get the best performance?
Also, did anyone notice the battery swap time on the main page is now down to 1 minute? That's pretty fast. I'd have to see it to believe it. But still, such a quick swap should future proof the S.
Ken
If not, then there is a potential performance boost going with the smaller battery which must be 300-500lb's lighter than the 300 mile option.
If true, and assuming the 5.6 sec. 0-60 is with the big one, then 0-60 could come as fast as 4.9 with smallest battery option.
I can't find it now, but I want to say I read the S with 300mile battery was 4000lb. (at 4000lb, 300lb savings is worth about .4 sec)
So would anyone get the smaller pack to get the best performance?
Also, did anyone notice the battery swap time on the main page is now down to 1 minute? That's pretty fast. I'd have to see it to believe it. But still, such a quick swap should future proof the S.
Ken