TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

Right balance between robots/automation and humans

Discussion in 'Tesla, Inc.' started by bhzmark, Apr 15, 2018.

  1. bhzmark

    bhzmark Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,340
    #1 bhzmark, Apr 15, 2018
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2018
    Musk's comment on CBS re excessive automation had me looking into it more and I found this good article on Tesla's automation efforts is at: Musk Says Excessive Automation Was ‘My Mistake’

    And especially this paragraph:
    “German OEMs -- traditionally the most enthusiastic proponents of automation -- have actually been rowing back on it in recent years,” Warburton wrote. “The best producers -- still the Japanese -- try to limit automation. It is expensive and is statistically inversely correlated to quality. One tenet of lean production is ‘stabilize the process, and only then automate.’ If you automate first, you get automated errors. We believe Tesla may be learning this to its cost.”

    Not surprisingly, to find the bleeding edge of automation, Tesla probably went a little too far -- at least at first. Maybe it will eventually pay off (unlike that conveyor belt thing I guess . . .) .
    But I can't help but think that the above tenet -- to stabilze with humans first, and then automate the human process -- is NOT the best recipe.

    MAchines/robots would not have the dexterity limitations of humans and if designed right you could, theoretically, find a much more efficient and stable robotic process that a human could never do at any speed.
     
    • Love x 1
  2. Tezlanian

    Tezlanian Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2018
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    North America
    I would not take that the Japanese and Germans removed certain automation as evidence of its impracticality. Both of those countries' automakers have interests in keeping laborers employed and busy even if it would decrease efficiency to a degree.

    Eventually Tesla will get to a fully automated production line. It may take a large rethink of how cars are designed to make the automation more simple. For example, assemble the entire interior as various modules and insert those at once to parallelize the production. There's no real reason for the final assembly to be as linear as it is other than the process was designed to be friendly for human workers. Automating a human process doesn't necessarily make sense.

    I agree that it was too risky for Tesla to attempt this level of automation with the Model 3. No one in the industry has succeeded in fully automating at speed and the risk was just too high. They should have had multiple production lines going. One for testing and tweaking fully autonomous assembly and the other a more classical human heavy approach. It would have ended up better ROI than these shutdowns and lagging production.
     
    • Like x 1
  3. S'toon

    S'toon Knows where his towel is

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2015
    Messages:
    3,667
    Location:
    AB
  4. nwdiver

    nwdiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,680
    Location:
    United States
    The tables have turned!

     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC