Why are we back here again? This is ridiculous, honestly.
So assuming you're sincere in your assertion that I misstated and was condescending, this will be my last attempt to explain. I will rephrase: Instead of stating the OP was incorrect, I should have clearly stated 'the OP was incorrect in her understanding of the information that Sterling conveyed.' I thought that was clear. I also said I thought the misunderstanding was understandable, given the situation. I have no idea why you would find a sincere statement like that on my part to be said in a 'condescending tone', when I was very very carefully trying to state what happened without assigning blame.
Please note that I was posting because I wanted to support her assertion that Sterling had shown up (which many people found unbelievable).
As far as me trying to 'Bonnie-splain', I was only conveying exactly what Sterling told me he said at the time.
I will be sure to be very precise in the future and include all the information into one sentence. I was at fault for assuming that everyone reading the post understood exactly what I was saying (and plenty of people did).
I'm not going to fight with you. I accept that you were unable to understand what I posted & that you assumed I was being condescending. I know I wasn't, but -shrug- nothing I can do about that.
