Actually, no.
The message was different, but a bit jumbled. With so many different interviews, so much stock footage (some of it only loosely related) I found the movie tiring. Leonardo had intelligent dialog, and the people being interviewed had interesting things to say, but it was sometimes hard to tell what points they were trying to make.
I am sure some people will think it is great, but I felt overwhelmed just from an "over-stimulated blip-verts" sort of way. I think perhaps the movie was trying to present too much material all at once.
At least it didn't make any outrageous, unbelievable points. It was trying to straddle the line between bleak and optimistic with a call to action, but I felt less motivated by this film compared to Inconvenient Truth.
My overall takeaways were the following:
#1: More evidence was presented to show that we are making our planet "sick".
#2: We can't depend on governments and big businesses to take care of things so we need to vote for appropriate change. (As far as how to stop big business from endlessly trying to grow the economy, the message was unclear... Should we all quit our jobs and join a commune?)
#3: We need to avoid the "rat race", slow down, and get out of an endless cycle of consumption. (If only it were so easy to do...)
#4: The earth can only support approx 1 billion people unless we "borrow from the future" by exploiting energy reserves. (So what do we do in the long term since the population keeps growing?)
On the positive side, they suggest that planet will "heal itself" after a while if we manage to make it inhospitable for ourselves... Some sort of life will carry on (but not necessarily humans).
I hope the future ends up being brighter for us than the movie lead me to expect.
But that is just what I thought about it...