How will Tesla renting solar panels at such low prices not have a significant impact on cash flow?
Tesla Makes Solar Affordable Again With New Monthly Rental Plans | CleanTechnica
Rent Your Solar
- Monthly payment
- Installation costs included
- No long term contract
- Monthly payment can be canceled anytime
- If you want your system removed to restore your roof to its previous condition, it will be $1,500 to cover Tesla’s cost. Tesla does not make a profit on this
- Support and maintenance included
- Available in most utilities
Unlike SCTY's PPAs/Leases, these rentals have
"No long term contract" and the
"Monthly payment can be canceled any time" which might inhibit attraction of investors in Variable Interest Entities to harvest the income tax subsidies (TSLA has years/$ Billions on NOLs to carry forward so TSLA itself cannot use the subsidies.)
"Available in most utilities" currently means:
2 in Arizona
4 in California (SMUD missed the cut)
2 in Connecticutt
6 in Massachusetts
4 in New Jersey
2 in New Mexico
Total 20 utilities. Estimates of total US electric utilities are in excess of 3,000 (~150 large IOUs, ~2,000 municipals, and ~1,000 co-ops) not including federal power agencies like TVA.
The Clean Technical article states:
For my location, it nets out to $0.13/kWh, which is far better than the variable utility pricing here.
Residential electrical energy in Texas, which has a relatively high solar irradiance, is widely available at around $0.08/kWh
Power To Choose | Home
TSLA has liquidated damages thresholds at GF-2 , and there have been reports that Panasonic is selling to third parties solar cells produced there. The rental program may be designed to use more of those solar cells by TSLA. Anyone find even a redacted version of the TSLA-Panasonic commercial terms at GF-2?