Or Mexican: My most favorite parable: The Mexican Fisherman And The Investment BankerThat's so European of you![]()
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or Mexican: My most favorite parable: The Mexican Fisherman And The Investment BankerThat's so European of you![]()
Interesting to see his evolution from ~74K to ~91K through the quarter.
Is that kind of evolution normal for him?
I think shorts must be stupid or ignorant or dishonest (or all three) to deny what is coming. People say computers will never drive better than humans, or at least not for many years, but that's what they said about chess and Go and poker and Jeopardy.
(skip to 42:00)
Agreed. Even though there has been a lot of progress at GF3, arguably building the shed is the easiest and most visually notable part of the construction process.I put the probability of a customer car rolling out before end of year to be very *high* -- you don't need much of a supply chain to get those first dozen cars out, and you want to run all the machinery through its paces -- but I also think that obstacles will prevent *volume production* from happening until Q1/Q2.
It does make sense to just sell parts to airplane manufacturers, however it doesn't sound much at all like Elon. My guess is that he would create a new business for aircraft and ask himself if his new company could buy parts from Tesla.Airframes are hard. I mean, really really asterisking hard. The government testing for them to be approved is really slow, too.
Given how busy Tesla is, what I think is much more likely would be Tesla selling powertrain kits to the other airplane manufacturers: batteries, chargers, maybe even motors and propellers, but letting someone else do the obnoxious airframe validation. Tesla's use of cylindrical cells makes it very possible for them to create small "airworthy" battery modules which could be packed into the airframe in whatever manner was appropriate for the particular plane.
A little puzzle that even took me a moment to figure out even I actually knew what I was looking at:
View attachment 425312
Ah. Nice one. I got the answer, after some hard thinking. ;-)
People need to lighten up. Having critical thoughts doesn’t put someone in cahoots with the shorts or big oil. Tsla fans were badgering an early Tesla owner and repeat Tesla buyer who also is interested in the Taycan and the move to sustainable transport. His interest is other companies stepping up and moving to EV’s is proof he’s a traitor and “war criminal” of some sort. Please don’t go out of your way to make new tslaq fans. Being a zealot or j-hole is no way to win fans and friends.
There’s a lot of bad journalism that’s due to not getting it and probably much less due to corruption. Cathie Wood posted today about analysts not understanding amazon back in the day. No cabal of evil, just short sited people who didn’t understand the business. In retrospect, the thing about amazon wasn’t the retail business, but their dedication to new opportunities and ability to implement. Tesla’s advantage isn’t EV’s, batteries or self driving per se, it’s all of that, but it’s the constant innovation and ability to build on each layer building and their vertical integration.
Anyhow, please try be kind or at least be cool. Telling people they’re monsters is not likely to win them over to your side.
Falcon HeavyIf a Model S only gets a 9.5 for performance, what merits a 10???
Today Elon Musk called out wsj reporter Charley Grant for potential ties to Jim Chanos.
Everyone who tracks Tesla closely knows the history of Charley and his negative narrative on TSLA. What was interesting to see if there was some truth to being linked to Jim Chanos and serving as his mouthpiece to the financial community.
Let’s go down the rabbit hole....
——
Check out this article:
How Jim Chanos Uses Cynicism, Chutzpah — and a Secret Twitter Account — to Take on Markets (and Elon Musk)
Chanos can appear world-weary and somewhat guarded — but, as the saying goes, in every cynic beats the bleeding heart of an idealist. “There’s more than a little of the crusader in him,” says longtime friend Jim Grant, founder and editor of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer. “He would like to clean up Wall Street. He would like to improve the quality of corporate reporting. He would like to rid Wall Street of the scoundrels and clean up corporate management.”
Charley’s Dad’s BFF - a little sloppy quote they probably regret
——
Jim Chanos has been short other very specific stocks:
—-
Caterpillar
Charley writes about it - helps out
Why Caterpillar Rolled Over
——
Valeant
No way - guess whose back caddying for Mr chanos on the back nine:
Valeant assets good, but debt burden an issue: Grant
——-
Jimbo shorts Mallinckrodt
Charley lends a hand
These Drug Companies Are Too Frail to Cure
——-
Jim calls out Uber
Legendary short vendor Jim Chanos: Uber and Lyft went public because they’d to, now not because they wished to – BrowseDesk
Charley calls out Uber and Jim responds via Twitter handle
Charley Grant on Twitter
Could go on and on...
Just saw this:
" Breaking News:
Director of Shanghai Development and Reform Commission: Tesla Gigafactory Shanghai is going smooth, on track to start production by the end of this year.
@Tesla @elonmusk
finance.ifeng.com/c/7nyze1bJN5P "
T☰SLA Mania on Twitter
My take: when it comes to punctuality, you just don't mess with the Chinese government, if they said it would be done, then it will be done, by hook or by crook.
Airframes are hard. I mean, really really asterisking hard.
My take: when it comes to punctuality, you just don't mess with the Chinese government, if they said it would be done, then it will be done, by hook or by crook.
That belief is the reason why I'm fairly certain that there will be more than just a few Tesla model 3's produced by the end of Q4. They will get shiznit done. It's not like they're stationary on hiring or supplies, or installation of the product lines as the finish building out parts of the building, or the power terminal.
I'd say the factory will produce somewhere between 5k-15k Model 3's by Q4.
If a Model S only gets a 9.5 for performance, what merits a 10???
Having looked through the past year of their reviews, the only 10s I found:
2020 McLaren 720S Spider review: Treat yo self
2018 McLaren 720S review: Raw power meets refined performance (same thing, just not a convertible)
2018 Porsche 911 GT3: Sports car perfection
2018 Mercedes-AMG GT R review: Bringing a gun to a knife fight
2018 Lamborghini Huracán Performante review: Supercar superstar
And the Model S not beating those in whatever their performance metric is, honestly, is perfectly fair. It's a much bigger vehicle, that's much less performance-oriented. That's fine, this is what the Roadster is for.
And, there's a lot of stuff that's nominally competition against the Model S Performance that is not getting even a 9.5 for performance.