Sure. Can go with a good "1-2 punch" of a two tweet chain... 1st tweet along the lines of the broad general point in the tweet I shared, 2nd tweet a hard hitting data point like the two you presented. The point is not to get lost in the weeds of the million false narratives the bears won't even have an intellectually honest debate about, but, instead, hammer home that they are heavily biased players not debating but pushing programming designed to protect massive amounts of money in the "fossil fuel economy."
For literally years, there's been very basic core misinformation messaging to try to stifle the capacity to respond to the bear messaging,
1. Tesla supporters are naive, "cult" members, fan boys, fan girls, emotional "true believers"
2. Elon Musk is a narcissistic, childish, volatile, defensive, dishonest, and at times brutal head of a company teetering on bankruptcy. You 'should' dislike and distrust Musk, the company, and the cars they make.
Both points are designed to frame any conversation you might try to engage in with a FUD influenced neighbor, coworker, etc., BEFORE the conversation even begins. If you don't enter the conversation conceding much of point 2 as a given, than your neighbor in their head goes to ("oh, I got a Kool Aid drinker here" and proceeds to tune you out and simply wait for you to stop talking).
This ground has been tilled for years, and with nearly all of mass media pushing it.
Note that nobody ever accuses anyone of being a "conspiracy theorist" for dismissing virtually all longs as "true believers," "fan boys," etc. despite these claims never having been substantively backed up. There's a place for the short pithy to the point phrase that sticks in people's minds. AND, unlike the bears, if we get challenged for substance to our pithy phrase, we've got a deep strong case based on facts and reason.
Best path I see, somewhat neutralize "cult" "fanboy" etc. type messaging the simple message,
Trillions of dollars of business partnership built over a century with the "fossil fuel economy" drives media and banking to flood us all with misinformation about Tesla, Elon Musk and their products.
I'm sure some here could make that much smoother and more concise... "The Fossil Fuel Economy and Trillion Dollar Cronyism in the Media and Wall Street," "The Fossil Fuel Economy's Trillion Dollar Media and Banking Reality Distortion Field"...
The underlying details being
1. Media and Banking (WS) have massive financial conflict of interest in their "coverage" of Tesla due to their century plus business relationship with the "fossil fuel economy" where trillions of dollars have exchanged hands.
2. You've been exposed to a silly amount of media coverage about Tesla and Elon Musk, haven't you? Always doom and gloom and disaster imminent, right? [I don't know about Europe, but, in the US it's been so off the charts in volume, I'm very confident most people already have wondered why they are constantly hearing about this guy Musk and Tesla]
3. Number 2 is not an accident. Media and Banking "coverage" has a massive bias to protect the "fossil fuel economy."