Re: Elon's share sales
I have no doubt there is a lot of pent up demand for TSLA shares so Elon's sales didn't (and don't) concern me in the least. The company is worth exactly the same amount whether he owns the 10% he said he would sell or someone else owns them. To my way of thinking this thread has been seriously derailed over what should be nothing more than temporary volatility based mostly on the psychological impact that Elon was selling a larger position than was necessary simply to exercise his options and pay taxes. The actual price impact based upon supply and demand is so temporary it's not even funny. Whatever we lose based on that is returned in coming days/weeks. Like I said, the company is worth whatever it's worth and that is based upon current and future performance, not who owns the shares.
That said, I doubt Elon has sold the entire approx. 17M shares already. But not to worry, Elon is not going to crash the price, he will sell into strength. I'm not going to lose a minute of sleep over this but we will know the selling is likely complete when we see the filings that indicate he divested about 10%. I haven't seen that yet (and I'm not sitting on the edge of my seat waiting for it). Elon is not stupid. Focus on the company's performance, not the sideshow.
On a related note, just an observation that will hopefully help some people deal with volatility in the future. I am shocked at how many investors here use the language "I lost $xxxxxxxx in the last (x) days". I mean, I really don't think people here were selling at the bottom and to use the language indication a loss of money just shows me those people are thinking about investing in an unproductive way. You only lose money when you sell at a loss. You can only claim it as a loss on your taxes if you actually take a loss. Same with a gain. It's unrealized until you sell. The "losses" most people were mentioning were "losses" of unrealized gains. Big deal! Shares are not money, they are fractional ownership.
We know that the exact amount someone will pay us for those shares varies from hour to hour and from day to day. It's not a secret or a big deal unless you are planning to buy or sell in that specific timeframe. But I trust that most people here have protected themselves from being forced to liquidate shares at inopportune times. Therefore it's not only incorrect to view temporary fluctuations in your account value as "losses", it's unproductive to your performance as investors. Someone claiming they "lost money" because the share price went through a period of temporary volatility just exposes them as not knowing what they are doing. Language matters because it indicates how a person thinks about their investments. Yes, everyone has to be a newbie at some point but the more quickly one grows as an investor and learns how to think about their investments more productively, the more profitable they can become over time. Learning to use more productive and more accurate language is the first step to thinking that way.
Sorry if this sounds like a lecture but I only mean it with the best of intentions.