D
dm28997
Guest
A Time article explains why no oil drilling will occur. Simple actually, profits and uncertainty. Too bad Tesla can't supply all the demand as they are the only company that makes quality, safe and dependable EVs.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if Tesla builds 2 million vehicles in 2022, that saves 100,000 barrels per day, then that sounds pretty good.
I really do not get why he would write this article? He has a bearish view on $TSLA and he owns 2 Teslas? Something's gotta give here...either Bernstein is forcing his hand (Unknown reasons) to be bearish or he's just clueless....and he seems like he's semi smart.
I really do not get why he would write this article? He has a bearish view on $TSLA and he owns 2 Teslas? Something's gotta give here...either Bernstein is forcing his hand (Unknown reasons) to be bearish or he's just clueless....and he seems like he's semi smart.
You should ask him on what metrics he thinks Tesla is overvalued. Not a gotcha moment, I just genuinely find it fascinating as to the excuse people use to say Tesla is overvalued.My nephew-in-law (CFO of his company) loves his Tesla, but he believes it’s overvalued. He wouldn’t dare shorting the stock, but he wouldn’t buy it either.
Most of the time, people that I know who think Tesla is overvalued have no clue about TeslaYou should ask him on what metrics he thinks Tesla is overvalued. Not a gotcha moment, I just genuinely find it fascinating as to the excuse people use to say Tesla is overvalued.
Most of the time, people that I know who think Tesla is overvalued have no clue about Tesla's actual finances.
Those who does DCA on Tesla and ends up with a lower price target usually requires growth to hit a brick wall sometime between 2022 and 2030. These people are not using 50% growth yoy till 2030 in their calculation. Any projection in which growth stalls in any random year in the near future will plummet Teslas multiple.You should ask him on what metrics he thinks Tesla is overvalued. Not a gotcha moment, I just genuinely find it fascinating as to the excuse people use to say Tesla is overvalued.
Most of the time, people that I know who think Tesla is overvalued have no clue about Tesla's actual finances.
At least this would have some degree of calculation involved. The otherwise-very-smart people I've talked to who think TSLA is overvalued are nearly universally anchored to 1 metric. "GM sells xxx bazillon cars, how can TSLA be worth more than GM when it only sells XXX cars?" In other words, middle school math as the basis for their opinion. Like I say, "otherwise"-smart people.Those who does DCA on Tesla and ends up with a lower price target usually requires growth to hit a brick wall sometime between 2022 and 2030. These people are not using 50% growth yoy till 2030 in their calculation. Any projection in which growth stalls in any random year in the near future will plummet Teslas multiple.
Yeah but those people doesn't have a price target. We are specifically talking about analysts with bearish price targets. Even Gordon does a DCA to come up with his nonsense.At least this would have some degree of calculation involved. The otherwise-very-smart people I've talked to who think TSLA is overvalued are nearly universally anchored to 1 metric. "GM sells xxx bazillon cars, how can TSLA be worth more than GM when it only sells XXX cars?" In other words, middle school math as the basis for their opinion. Like I say, "otherwise"-smart people.
And they ignore that GM, Ford, Toyota, Honda....All peak car sales were like 5 years ago. Declines ever since. So your investing in a companies sales are increasing YoY or going down YoY. So basic. Yet they dont see it.At least this would have some degree of calculation involved. The otherwise-very-smart people I've talked to who think TSLA is overvalued are nearly universally anchored to 1 metric. "GM sells xxx bazillon cars, how can TSLA be worth more than GM when it only sells XXX cars?" In other words, middle school math as the basis for their opinion. Like I say, "otherwise"-smart people.
That someone who bought naked shorted shares does not actually have the shares in his portfolio. He only owns a promise to receive those shares when they are delivered. It's usually after the naked shorter has exhausted all of the ways he can avoid coming up with real shares. We've had plenty of discussions about this in the past. Particularly, surrounding the delivery of naked-shorted shares to the rightful owners during the stock dividend of 4 shares, a while back.If somebody buys the "naked short" do the shares in their portfolio vanish? The shares vanish or have the number of shares increased. Someone holds the "bag".
When I buy shares, I get them from the "street" or the broker, not a specific individual. The broker would have to fail to deliver to me, and that would kill the broker.That someone who bought naked shorted shares does not actually have the shares in his portfolio. He only owns a promise to receive those shares when they are delivered. It's usually after the naked shorter has exhausted all of the ways he can avoid coming up with real shares. We've had plenty of discussions about this in the past. Particularly, surrounding the delivery of naked-shorted shares to the rightful owners during the stock dividend of 4 shares, a while back.
A Bloomberg video on projections of oil decline due to EV adoption. TLDW: EV adoption may cause loss of oil demand by 2 million bpd as early as 2023.
They use projections by other car automakers (video was made in 2016) in terms of EV sales, but we know no one else is close meeting their EV sales other than Tesla.
That's not true anymore............a year ago when Tesla had a Forward P/E of 300+, sure, any hiccup in growth would plummet Tesla's multiple.Those who does DCA on Tesla and ends up with a lower price target usually requires growth to hit a brick wall sometime between 2022 and 2030. These people are not using 50% growth yoy till 2030 in their calculation. Any projection in which growth stalls in any random year in the near future will plummet Teslas multiple.
So I actually don't argue potential when I talk to people that I know that think Tesla is overvalued. That gives them an out in terms of saying "Well I don't believe in that future growth". I use cold hard numbers.Most of the time, people that I know who think Tesla is overvalued have no clue about Tesla's actual finances.and think they just make cars.
FTFY...
Tesla now is entering the big league like Michael Jordan at the beginning of his rookie NBA season. Everyone recognized he was very talented after winning a college basketball national championship and making the game winning shot at the buzzer.Most people still view EV's as something being forced by concerns about climate change, an expensive and less than optimum compromise. They don't understand EV's make sense on every level, they think it's a sacrifice to switch to EV's for the sake of the environment.
Because of this misunderstanding, they see the war in Ukraine and all the economic sanctions as taking precedence, something that will temporarily remove the urgency to transition. That, combined with the uncertainty people feel about the future, is all it takes to remove the shine of a company with a valuation that many see as only making sense in an optimistic, utopian future, a future many see as further away than ever. They can't see how Tesla makes sense in a less prosperous future.
The fact remains, market valuations are a product of all investors, and many of them are incredibly dumb and unable to see the bigger picture. That's OK, it's normal and expected. Just know that time has a way of revealing all.
Took a few games to see his talent, but years to believe that a 6'6' shooting guard could lead a team to a championship let alone 6.Tesla now is entering the big league like Michael Jordan at the beginning of his rookie NBA season. Everyone recognized he was very talented after winning a college basketball national championship and making the game winning shot at the buzzer.
Still, many thought the hype had far outstripped the talent. Two teams had passed up on him in the draft, so he was picked third. Others thought a 6'6" tall shooting guard would struggle against taller NBA competitors--"The Big Boys are coming." The Chicago Bulls were perennial losers too, so he wouldn't have much help from the team.
It only took a few games for the reality to begin to become apparent, even for the most daft of observers.
When Tesla posts 2022 net income of $20+ billion and 80-100% production growth whilst the rest of the industry is going down in flames, the dominance will be undeniable.
The MJ analogy fails in one major aspect. He was playing an athletic game, limited by human physiology; Tesla is playing a technology game, limited only by the laws of physics and creativity. The margin of victory can be orders of magnitude higher in engineering competitions.