Most auto analysts are mismatched to cover Tesla. The auto industry is matured, cyclical and quite profitable at the moment. They seem not even able to comprehend, aside from cyclical nature, why auto stocks are valued at such low PE, and hence constantly apply the same auto valuation metrics to Tesla. On top of that, most analysts don't follow particular stocks in proper depth required. An analyst probably won't put a 4q17 delivery number higher than 2500 if he is aware of that InsideEVs put Nov delivery at ~350, and Tesla has to manually assemble part of an M3 battery pack to get around the bottleneck.It is interesting that every analyst I am aware of with a low Tesla price target, is at the bottom in terms of ability. I don't understand how they have a job, or get press coverage. When they show up on TV, the first thing that should be mentioned in the introduction, is "So, Mr. Osborne, you are one of the worst analysts on record, and are basically always wrong. Please give us your opinion on Tesla..."
Tesla operates like a young tech company, even the over-promise/behind schedule delivery is a typical tray of such a company. Auto analysts are not fit to cover a fast evolving and disrupting company.