Knightshade
Well-Known Member
Never said it wasn’t real, only stated we would have to have identical conditions to be accurate
No, you wouldn't.
If that were so then nobodys time slip counts against yours unless they raced at the exact same track on the exact same day and under the exact same conditions
and all the comparison tests you mentioned, did they test all under the same conditions or run same car once at track and other time on the street with a .15% decline then state they are within a tenth of a second of each, so accurate ?.
Thanks for asking basic questions clearly already answered in the links I provided- confirming my prediction you would not bother to read any of the sources provided to you
Done with this, not posting in this thread until I see a time slip beating mine
You already have. You just refuse to accept it.
and this is in no way a knock at magnusmako, I am sure his car and his driving skill is every bit of me and he would give me a run if not beat me on the track and did put up proof to back up his statement, I just question the decline part as it does in even a small way impact your times and most tracks tested have a slight incline for accuracy not decline.
Can you show us the survey data where you personally measured the exact elevation change at the track you ran your time on the day you ran it so we can confirm your time isn't the result of an even greater downhill?
Your answer will only be accepted if printed on a timeslip BTW.
I mean how else can we be SURE?