Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog Will We Own Cars in Fifteen Years and How Will Enthusiasts Survive This?

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
My name is Eric Bergerson and I’m an industrial designer with an additional background in physics. I work as a consultant in the autonomous vehicle industry and I’m very interested in what’s going to happen when Uber, Lyft and the dozens of competitors to those companies are about to have in America and abroad start using cost effective autonomous vehicles.

Widespread availability of autonomous vehicles will cause the greatest social and economic transformation the human race has experienced since the advent of the internet, and possibly since the Industrial Revolution. It will save over thirty thousand American lives and over two million injuries per year, give Americans seventy-five billion hours of their time back, save consumers almost three trillion dollars of disposable income, solve a significant portion of our environmental crisis, electrify America’s automobile fleet, revolutionize urban planning, change the very physical infrastructure of our cities and quite possibly end terrorism. In addition to all these grand achievements, autonomous vehicle technology will also do little things for us like free us from having to take the kids to swimming lessons every day. Sounds incredible, right? That’s because it is incredible, but don’t forget that autonomous vehicle technology will also put seven million people in the unemployment line in its early days and if current auto manufacturers aren’t careful, it’s going to do to them what Netflix and Redbox did to Blockbuster Video ten years ago.

Autonomous vehicles are a disruptive technology that’s going to cause an explosion in on-demand car services like Lyft and Uber because it will ultimately allow those companies to provide transportation at a much lower cost than our current model of privately owned or leased cars, without any significant extra inconvenience to the consumer. Right now we pay to have 24-hour access to our vehicles, but we only use them four percent of the time. By taking advantage of shared car usage and the fact that autonomous technology will cut Uber’s costs to a fraction of their current level, on-demand use of cars will explode in the decades after autonomous cars debut. Or at least it will explode everywhere other than low density population areas like the rural Midwest, where I grew up. Once Uber and its competitors can transport a consumer for only a fraction of the cost of privately owning a car, consumers will gradually stop buying cars. This will take decades, but once this transformation is complete, transportation will be a service rather than a product in America. We, and indeed, the rest of the world, will be traveling around in a fleet of shared vehicles that we as consumers do not personally own and which could be called “The Mobility Cloud.

So what does this mean for us auto enthusiasts? Are our days of cruising the open road over? Will we spend the rest of our lives being shuttled around in soulless, corporate owned fleet econoboxes? Will the greatest automotive spark our kids experience be the time they got picked up in an Aston Martin robotaxi rather than the BYD robotaxi they’re used to? Check back here for updates, as I plan to write more about how we can save ourselves from such a dreary future devoid of automotive excitement.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: lunitiks
Regarding your taxi analysis, I think you left out a key factor: autonomous taxis with no drivers will be significantly cheaper than today's taxis.

I was just using those tables to point out that not only would rental not go away, it would be quite likely to unify the systems. I could imagine rental cars moving like semis, with special deals for some rides because it's better than heading somewhere empty.
 
Building enough capacity to handle rush hour means extra unused capacity during the rest of the day

I wonder how much idle capacity there is during rush hour now? We have a spare vehicle stood on the drive, and the (retired) grandparents wouldn't dream of driving into town during rush hour! so as a family I think we have spare vehicles equal to our own usage during rush hour (assuming that we rented them out as taxis, notwithstanding the "I don't want someone puking in my car / slashing the seats" conundrum).
 
Here's another question about rush hour traffic: if you're driving yourself it's a one way trip and then the car is off the road. If you're using a TAAS model, does that actually put more traffic on the road? So a one way trip turns into that trip plus the car getting to you and then going somewhere else - that's 2 more legs, during a high volume time. (Assuming the on demand model is going to be actually used most at highest demand otherwise what's the point?) How do you account for these extra trips and the extra traffic they seem to imply?
 
I take offense to the end terrorism article... even the premise is incorrect. It equates western presence with terrorism and equates autonomous cars with electrification. Both of these views, in my opinion, are naive at best. (no offense)
 
Why would people stop having their own cars? People aren't going to stop having their own houses. In general, people want to have exclusive ownership and use of the things they use. Generally, people only don't do this when they don't have enough money to. If everyone is going to be poor in the future, then sharing seems more realistic, but I hope that is not going to be the case.

IMO, sharing only becomes desirable when talking about something that only gets used maybe a 3 or 4 times per year at most. At which point, the lowered cost of sharing is worth it. Like neighborhood pools. I use my car every single day.
 
Why would people stop having their own cars? People aren't going to stop having their own houses. In general, people want to have exclusive ownership and use of the things they use. Generally, people only don't do this when they don't have enough money to. If everyone is going to be poor in the future, then sharing seems more realistic, but I hope that is not going to be the case.

IMO, sharing only becomes desirable when talking about something that only gets used maybe a 3 or 4 times per year at most. At which point, the lowered cost of sharing is worth it. Like neighborhood pools. I use my car every single day.
It only makes sense for city dwellers, and not so much suburbanites. The author also advocated single person transport vehicles. The don't work great for grocery trips with a spouse, etc.

However, when I travel something like this might be great in my destination city, however it'd need to hold 2-5 people and need to be able to carry luggage like a taxi so, once again, the single person transport thing is out. It'd also need to be incredibly available. It should pick me up within 5 minutes of when I call for it. Now, if I have luggage in it, it shouldn't go running around give other people rides either. Maybe I'll just need an autonomous rental instead of catching autonomous Uber/Lyft-like rides.

There's also something quite satisfying about owning your own car... If I lose my house I can always live in my car. haha.
 
Why would people stop having their own cars? People aren't going to stop having their own houses. In general, people want to have exclusive ownership and use of the things they use. Generally, people only don't do this when they don't have enough money to. If everyone is going to be poor in the future, then sharing seems more realistic, but I hope that is not going to be the case.

IMO, sharing only becomes desirable when talking about something that only gets used maybe a 3 or 4 times per year at most. At which point, the lowered cost of sharing is worth it. Like neighborhood pools. I use my car every single day.

There are a few reasons to stop having your own car in an autonomous world:
(1) You'll save a boatload of money: People with plenty of money could still own their own car, but an awful lot of people _don't_ have a lot of money or financial stability and those people will enjoy the savings and reduced stress of cheap taxis. No car loan, no repairs, no service, no registration, no insurance.
(2) You won't have to drive: We don't know how much autonomous systems will cost, but unless they're very cheap, autonomy will add significant cost to the price of a car. The choice will not necessarily be between your own autonomous car or using autonomous taxis, it could be between riding in autonomous taxis, paying more and driving your own car or paying a lot more and having your own autonomous car.
(3) There will be little benefit to owning commuter vehicles: in a world of cheap taxis, the main benefit of owning your own vehicle would be the ability to go anywhere at a moment's notice. If you have a car that's just used for commuting, it's poor value. You could increase value with a cheap commuter, but you'll have to drive it.

And an indirect benefit of people not owning their own vehicles is that fleet fuel economy could be expected to rise, as people would no longer be buying unused utility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LotusFan
Plus there will be a tendency / trend to use the car that fits the bill. When you're on your own, you don't need a behemoth to go from A to B. Take the family out, use 'the big car' then.

Copy%2Bof%2B%2Bmodal%2Bmix.jpg