Do the Hakkas last longer than the Michelins? I had a set of Hakkas on my last car, A Q50 Hybrid AWD. They seem to wear pretty good. Had I kept the car I would project a useful life of at least 20K miles of winter driving..
Definitely maybe, but I am not certain yet.
I have had them for 1 winter so far vs. 2 for Michelins, and the latter were down to 4-5/32nds.
You don't want to keep winter tiers past 4/32nds, when they turn into all seasons. The usable treadlife of a winter tire is way shorter than that of the summers. Once my X-Ices hit 4/32nds, I finished them off during spring/early summer, and replaced them with R3's.
As of right now, my Hakka R3's are down to between 7-9/32nds (they start at 10/32). Rears got more wear. Rears and fronts get swapped for the second year, so maybe they will last longer.
I also went with 10mm wider 245/45R18 tires for extra stability (and will do the same for the summers the next time around). Wider rubber contact patch spreads the wear, and reduced squirm probably minimizes the wear during appropriately enthusiastic turns.
Words of caution about Hakka R3's:
- The V-shaped tread pattern is noisier on the highway, and can get bothersome on longer drives.
- They were made in Russia. I would not count on their availability at all, definitely not at the old price points.
HTH,
a
P.S.: My next set of winters will be a return to either Michelin Ice-series or Blizzak's.