Which company do you think would help tesla. Maybe audi or mazda to compete with bmw merc, toyota and honda.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
I see a problem here. When you are building a high performance car, cost isn't of high importance. You can use more exotic materials, like kevlar, aluminium chasie and such. Then the whole car weighs 800kg, with batteries 1200kg. Job well done.
But if you are building larger and cheaper car, cost becomes a limiting factor. Now you have to use cheaper, more mainstream materials and build a bigger car. That is going to be much havier. Say around 1200kg without batteries. Add current roadsters bat-pack and you have 1600kg bodywaight. And you have another goal - larger range. Same bat-pack, higher weight gives lower range, so you must use more batteris. Which is again more costly and again havier. Not good sittuation.
The only sollution that I can see is to use some other, lightier battery technoly. EEStor's ultracaps maybe?
But if you are building larger and cheaper car, cost becomes a limiting factor. Now you have to use cheaper, more mainstream materials and build a bigger car. That is going to be much havier. Say around 1200kg without batteries. Add current roadsters bat-pack and you have 1600kg bodywaight. And you have another goal - larger range. Same bat-pack, higher weight gives lower range, so you must use more batteris. Which is again more costly and again havier. Not good sittuation.
The only sollution that I can see is to use some other, lightier battery technoly. EEStor's ultracaps maybe?
another problem with the sedan is that it will undoubtfully be less aerodynamic which will
worsen the fuel economy or efficiency, or mpc.
worsen the fuel economy or efficiency, or mpc.
>But if you are building larger and cheaper car, cost becomes a limiting factor. Now you have to use
>cheaper, more mainstream materials and build a bigger car. That is going to be much havier.
I don't buy it.
My Saturn is certainly larger than the Roadster (though it is NOT a large car), but it weighs
about the same as the Roadster does. No fancy aluminum chassis. No carbon-fiber (though
dent-resistant panels are a definite plus for me).
Cars have become FAR too heavy in the last ten years.
-Dave
>cheaper, more mainstream materials and build a bigger car. That is going to be much havier.
I don't buy it.
My Saturn is certainly larger than the Roadster (though it is NOT a large car), but it weighs
about the same as the Roadster does. No fancy aluminum chassis. No carbon-fiber (though
dent-resistant panels are a definite plus for me).
Cars have become FAR too heavy in the last ten years.
-Dave
Yah, its all about the battery technology ;D, if they can double the capacity of the batteries, we should be seeing heavier electric cars around in no time 
tonybelding
Active Member
GreenSpeed said:Yah, its all about the battery technology ;D, if they can double the capacity of the batteries, we should be seeing heavier electric cars around in no time
I don't think so. Even with double the capacity, it would still have a small fraction of the energy in a tank of gasoline. And I've got to say I'm skeptical about doubling the energy density of Li-ion batteries. Improvements in battery storage tend to come slowly, in small increments, and most chemists would say we're already pushing close to the natural limits. I hope they are wrong, because doubling the capacity would help electric cars a LOT, but I'm not sure anybody should bet their business on that happening Real Soon Now.
google flow through battery and find vanadium flow through. They can be refilled in aobut thirty seconds. HIGH energy density too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery -- read a bit and it will answer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery -- read a bit and it will answer
Hehe, charge tank, you literally fill it up
But still, it is chemistry, chorosive and not very longstanding.
My bet is on ultracapacitors.
But still, it is chemistry, chorosive and not very longstanding.
My bet is on ultracapacitors.
Weight is one of the biggest mileage killers. We definitely need to get the whole auto industry to change over to composite body parts. Probably isn't going to happen in the next 10 years. Oh well. In the meantime, I'm holding out for the optimal chemical battery/ultracapacitor combination in the next 10 years to help reduce the weight of electric cars and/or extend their range. I know, forever the optimist. ;D
tonybelding said:
True, but that's not the only factor at work here. Between the two, electric cars are (ballpark figure) roughly at least 3 times as efficient as our gas cars of today. So, while gasoline has about 10 times the stored energy as current lithium batteries, the gas powered engines/drive trains/etc. are only one third as efficient (meaning today gasoline stores usable energy of 10/3, or about 3.4 times that of batteries). So if battery energy was double, gasoline would only have a 1.7 times the usable energy equivalent. And considering our gas engines have had 100 years of development, whereas the lithium battery has only had 15 years(?), and ultracapacitors even less, I would bet that usable energy storage density in batteries will surpass gasoline quite soon.
tonybelding
Active Member
WarpedOne said:
Ultracapacitors sound great. If they could even get close to the energy density of today's Li-ion batteries, they'd be the way to go -- rapid charging, never degrade or need replacing. But is it really possible? I've heard some people say high-density ultracaps are coming soon, and I've heard some others say it's a pipe dream in the same category with perpetual motion. I don't know who to believe on that score.
The enthusiasm for ultracaps reminds me a little of the enthusiasm for flywheel storage a few years back. "In just a few years," they said, "we'll have flywheels improved to the point where they're practical for electric cars." Now it's a few years later and you don't hear about flywheels anymore, while the companies that were promoting them have switched to researching battery-electric vehicles.
I "feel" ultracapacitors are more down to earth technology. What are their true limits is to be seen, but they are alredy here and now. For example, http://www.maxwell.com/ produces ultracaps that are already used in airbuse planes to power emergency door actuators.
Even if the storage was much less, say 80% of the Tesla's, and the car only got 150-200 miles it would be worth it to have the ability to recharge in a couple minutes. 150 miles would handle almost all commuting needs, and if it didn't then you charge it up.
Zero maintenance and a near infinite life would be a huge bonus as well.
All the same capacitors have been around for a hundred years, adding the word Ultra doesn't change the basic concept. They do appear to have made a huge breakthrough at MIT, but I'm not holding my breath until I see a single working prototype, the way Tesla has.
Zero maintenance and a near infinite life would be a huge bonus as well.
All the same capacitors have been around for a hundred years, adding the word Ultra doesn't change the basic concept. They do appear to have made a huge breakthrough at MIT, but I'm not holding my breath until I see a single working prototype, the way Tesla has.
tonybelding
Active Member
WarpedOne said:
At one of their presentations, a representative from Tesla Motors said the "White Star" sedan is likely to use the same kind of extruded-aluminum chassis. That's not only because of weight, but it works well in a low-volume production vehicle. He said if you stamp the chassis out of steel, getting machinery set up for that is so expensive you'd have to build 100,000 cars for it to make financial sense.
Plus, they have an established relationship with Lotus, and Lotus have got this: http://www.gglotus.org/ggrace/vva-chassis/vva-chassis.htm
WarpedOne said:
EEStor sounds like a great product! I realy hope that they deliver on their promises. If they do, then we could soon have EVs that outperform ICE cars in every way! (performance, looks, range, fill-up time, and efficency!)
There are only two things that concern me about EEStor's product.
1.) How much does it cost?
2.) Is it real? Is this all just vaporware?
Hopefully they will pull back the curtain on their mysterious ultracap soon :-\
EEStor is still a mistery...
>> (performance, looks, range, fill-up time, and efficency!)
Well, fill-up times won't go away. It is not a battery-tech that is limiting them but energy distribution.
10-minute capability is irrelevant when you only have 10kW (tipical home) connection. Even large factory connections in megawatt range will only suffice for filling-up **one** car in 10-20 minutes.
The best way is to just start thinking/operating on new terms. Instead of driving until batteries are empty and then waiting for them to fill up you plug it in the evening and unplug it in the morning. In this way fill-up time is practicaly reduced into few seconds of your time. It doesn't metter if it took one or five hours in the night when you were asleep.
>> (performance, looks, range, fill-up time, and efficency!)
Well, fill-up times won't go away. It is not a battery-tech that is limiting them but energy distribution.
10-minute capability is irrelevant when you only have 10kW (tipical home) connection. Even large factory connections in megawatt range will only suffice for filling-up **one** car in 10-20 minutes.
The best way is to just start thinking/operating on new terms. Instead of driving until batteries are empty and then waiting for them to fill up you plug it in the evening and unplug it in the morning. In this way fill-up time is practicaly reduced into few seconds of your time. It doesn't metter if it took one or five hours in the night when you were asleep.
