TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC

2017 JD Power's Auto Dependability Study

Discussion in 'Tesla' started by SocalMS, Feb 23, 2017.

  1. SocalMS

    SocalMS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    211
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    The consulting company J.D. Power released its 2017 auto dependability study Wednesday. The study measures problems per 100 vehicles based on responses from 35,186 original owners of 2014 model-year vehicles. The industry average is 156 problems per 100 vehicles, up four from a year earlier.

    Here are the rankings, the problems per 100 vehicles and the number of places each brand rose or fell from the 2016 study.

    1. Lexus, 110 (0); Porsche, 110 (+1)

    3. Toyota, 123 (+1)

    4. Buick, 126 (-1)

    5. Mercedes-Benz, 131 (+6)

    6. Hyundai, 133 (+12)

    7. BMW, 139 (+6)

    8. Chevrolet, 142 (-2)

    9. Honda, 143 (-2)

    10. Jaguar, 144 (not ranked in 2016)

    11. Kia, 148 (+5)

    12. Lincoln, 150 (-3); Mini, 150 (+5)

    14. GMC, 151 (-9)

    15. Cadillac, 152 (-1)

    16. Audi, 153 (-6)

    17. Volvo, 154 (-2)

    18. Chrysler, 159 (+3)

    19. Subaru, 164 (+3)

    20. Volkswagen, 164 (+4)

    21. Mazda, 166 (-1)

    22. Acura, 167 (-14)

    23. Nissan, 170 (+3)

    24. Land Rover, 178 (+4)

    25. Mitsubishi, 182 (-6)

    26. Ford, 183 (+4); Ram, 183 (-18)

    28. Dodge, 187 (+3)

    29. Infiniti, 203 (-17)

    30. Jeep, 209 (-3)

    31. Fiat, 298 (-6)
     
  2. DriverOne

    DriverOne Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    553
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    To save everyone some time, Tesla does not appear in that list.
     
    • Like x 1
  3. ShockOnT

    ShockOnT Quickish

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2016
    Messages:
    1,051
    Location:
    Sydney
    Too late to save me!
     
    • Funny x 2
    • Like x 1
  4. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    12,564
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    Maybe JD Power did not get enough responses from Tesla owners (because relatively fewer owners compared to the long established companies) to have confidence in publishing a number for Tesla?
     
  5. kort677

    kort677 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,643
    Location:
    florida.
    in early 2014 I took delivery of #33XXX, the point is that they would have had to have had almost 100% participation rate from tesla owners to be able to draw conclusions.
    as others noted there just weren't that many teslas on the road when this study was taken
     
  6. DriverOne

    DriverOne Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    553
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    "35,186 original owners of 2014 model-year vehicles"

    I think that 35,185 is across all brands, so about 1,000 per brand. There were certainly >1,000 Teslas made in 2014!

    Could be Tesla is/was seen as a niche brand? EV and ICE deemed not comparable? EVs *should* have all the reliability advantages.
     
  7. SageBrush

    SageBrush Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2015
    Messages:
    3,678
    Location:
    Colorado
    Not even close, because the lion's share of "problems" are not drivetrain related, they are fit and finish, and feature related like the telematics and info-tainment systems.
     
  8. Vitold

    Vitold Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,203
    Location:
    NM
    Biggest gain:
    6. Hyundai, 133 (+12)


    Biggest loser:
    26. Ram, 183 (-18) (five time Motor Trends truck of the year)
     
  9. kort677

    kort677 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,643
    Location:
    florida.
    I disagree, while there certainly were a lot of fit and finish issues the teslas from that time had big issues with the drive unit, numerous ones were replaced and they also had a battery contact issue that affected many cars
     
  10. SocalMS

    SocalMS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    211
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    "were" is not the operative word. "Is" and "still is" is more appropriate.

    Tesla vehicles DEFINITELY have trim/fitment issues in every area.. from chrome trims, carpeting, leather, stitching, etc...

    They need to address this and not just focus on the battery...

    It's embarrassing to drive around a 100K+ car w/ loose carpeting, chrome trims bulging out, or excessive wind noise...
     
  11. TexLaw

    TexLaw Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2017
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    Bellaire, TX
    I do hope I don't miss my Lexus too much.
     
  12. SocalMS

    SocalMS Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2017
    Messages:
    211
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    You'll enjoy the ride.. because the car drives like it's flying....

    but the you will definitely miss the overall quality of a Lexus...
     

Share This Page