-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
AP accidents
- Thread starter Terminator857
- Start date
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
That's terrifying, I hope there was no one near that truck!
Does TACC not use radar returns from stationary objects at all?
How I imagine NNs:
Tam
Well-Known Member
Well. What do you expect? It's just too dark! I am not sure if human drivers could respond timely in darkness either! But thanks for the link. I'll drive with Night Vision Goggles next time.
jabloomf1230
Minister of Silly Walks
That was my impression also. The object was a sideways, dark colored truck on an unlit road at night. Let's wring our hands about this common occurrence.
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
MY1stEV
Member
Sandy Munro is a big proponent of integrating FLIR cameras (infrared) for autonomous driving cars, and this is a pretty good example of a situation where a FLIR camera would have seen the disabled car in the lane ahead.
Tam
Well-Known Member
Yes, but at high speed, we need long-range. Headlights are too short for range. By the time I see an obstacle shining by the bright headlight, it would be too late to avoid a collision.
EVNow
Well-Known Member
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Yes, very concerning. What do you suggest Tesla do - just completely abandon AP/FSD and return all the money or close down the company ?
Last edited:
We only have apologists or concern trolls here
This is what this thread is, to me... since there are like 8-10 other threads in this subforum on the first page or two that this could have been posted in, rather than a new thread created...but that doesnt bring the same visability for "discussion".
Last edited:
linux-works
Active Member
v2x, my man. v2x. if we just admit that its a great thing to have and put some manpower behind making it interoperable and useful, think of it as beacons that can announce presence and NOT require vision or radar. just radio waves!
every layer helps. but I find lots of resistance toward v2x and tesla does not have any plans for it. its not on its, [cough..] radar.
linux-works
Active Member
"dont spit into the wind,
dont pull the mask off the old lone ranger
and you dont mess around with jim."
oops, sorry. carry on.
Daniel in SD
(supervised)
More nags! I haven't seen anyone here blaming Tesla for the collision. I blame all the people complaining about phantom braking.
I'm a little bit disturbed that some people think it's ok to drive when their eyesight is equivalent to a low dynamic range recompressed twitter video...
EVNow
Well-Known Member
EVNow
Well-Known Member
Yes, if these concern-trolls post this in the investor section/thread, they would be banned in 3 .. 2 .. 1.
Tam
Well-Known Member
So what we can learn from the statement?
1) Machine vision (video) is not as good as humans': What's the point here? Should we use Tesla Vision or not?
2) Since the car and junk are not invisible because, once within the range of headlights, the machine should pick those clues up and do an evasive maneuver?
3) AP/FSD should slow down to be as safe as the reaction time within the headlights' range?
Similar threads
