It may indeed be a QC oversight. But it becomes impractical to fully “burn in” every component or the whole vehicle for that matter. Often they will do sub samples to monitor things. There is some cost to allowing some flaws through. But it would be to costly to reach 99.999% flaw free.Yeah, while under my rock I actually read the page you pointed to: thought this extract was pertinent
"Failures during infant mortality are highly undesirable and are always caused by defects and blunders: material defects, design blunders, errors in assembly, etc."
The underlining is mine. Dare I suggest it indicates that Tesla's QC is a bit *sugar*?
Genuinely can't believe that anyone thinks it's unreasonable to complain about your heater breaking down after a week.
Your biggest concern should NOT be the flaw. It’s that the SC fixes the correct thing correctly without breaking something else